Vax-Unvax: Let The Science Speak!

The US government, corporate media, Big Tech, and the World Health Organization have dismissed as “anti-vaxxers” or “conspiracy theorists”, ridiculed, and silenced anyone – including outstanding doctors and scientists – who raise concerns about the safety and/or efficacy of the COVID policies or shots or any vaccine. We are all now supposed to just follow orders because any questions are said to cause “vaccine hesitancy”. See War Is Growing Against Top American Doctors! and Growing Censorship of Questions About COVID Narrative.

California passed a law that threatened the license of any doctor who raised such questions. Fortunately, Doctors who question COVID vaccines sue California over new medical misinformation law shows that one of those doctors is Mark McDonald, a psychiatrist in the Los Angeles area, author of the 2021 book United States of Fear: How America Fell Victim to a Mass Delusional Psychosis and the 2022 book Freedom from Fear: A 12 Step Guide to Personal and National Recovery. The law was shot down: California’s Covid Misinformation Law Blocked by Federal Court.

Government health policies and vaccines are seen as a Holy Grail that cannot be questioned in the Land of the Free where our God-given rights of Free Speech and Freedom of the Press are protected by the First Amendment. Yet, Big Pharma now makes billions of dollars from the sale of vaccines and has no liability for any injuries. In addition, many vaccines are now mandated for kids and the COVID shots were mandated for many people who worked and for students in many schools.

The government and corporate media have ignored the fact that the CDC stats showed in early 2020 that COVID threatened almost no one. They also ignored that several effective early treatments were known in early 2020 including HCQ/zinc, Ivermectin, vitamin D3, vitamin C, and budesonide. In fact, the Emergency Use Authorizations for the COVID shots were illegal because EUAs can be issued only if no treatments are available. See Do Senate Hearings Show COVID-19 Vaccine Use Illegal?

Now the government and corporate media are ignoring alarming numbers of injuries and deaths caused by the COVID shots and COVID hospital protocols. See Excess Mortality Just Got Worse: Alarming New Data!

CDC Coverup of MMR Vaccine Injuries

Episode 6 of “COVID Revealed” includes an interview with Dr. Brian Hooker whose son Steve was injured by the MMR vaccine in May 1999 at age 15 months. Steve lost eye contact, the ability to talk, and developed very severe GI problems. By 18 months, he was diagnosed with autism. Steve’s pediatrician refused to submit a report to VAERS. His son is 23 now. He is nonverbal, has GI issues, and requires care.

?

Yet, the CDC maintains there’s no connection between the MMR vaccine and autism. So, Hooker submitted FOIA requests to discover information the CDC was hiding. He found that the CDC had manipulated data to hide the connection between the use of thimerosal in the MMR vaccine and autism. He is still sending FOIA request to the CDC and has received about a quarter million pages of documents.

Dr. William Thompson, the CDC whistleblower featured in Vaxxed: From Coverup To Catastrophe by Del Bigtree, host of The Highwire, exposed the CDC’s coverup of the link between the MMR vaccine and autism — particularly in African-American boys. The film went viral. The CDC destroyed federal records to hide the mayhem the vaccine causes. Thompson felt guilty about his role in the cover-up and started guiding Dr. Hooker’s search by suggesting that he request certain information that would reveal the CDC coverup.

Over a period of 8-9 months, Dr. Hooker recorded over 40 phone conversations with Thompson and exchanged hundreds of emails with him where he admitted that he and others at the CDC had committed fraud by changing the data to hide the connection between the MMR vaccine and autism. Thompson revealed that his supervisors at the CDC were requiring the destruction of federal records that showed that the timing of the MMR vaccine was linked particularly to the high rate of autism in Black boys. Thompson was never compensated by the vaccine compensation fund.

NEW BOOK TACKLES VAX VS UNVAX 9/8/23

Co-author of the New York Times Best Seller Vax-Unvax: Let the Science Speak Brian Hooker, PhD, details the years of research undertaken with co-author, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., to locate over 60 peer-reviewed studies, science they let speak for itself in this new book.

Complete with user-friendly graphics, the book gives clear information on the outcome of those who followed the childhood vaccination schedule versus those who didn’t, and the distinctly different outcomes.

?

Vax-Unvax: Let the Science Speak 8/29/23

Amazon Description

The Studies the CDC Refuses to Do

This book is based on over one hundred studies in the peer-reviewed literature that consider vaccinated versus unvaccinated populations. Each study is analyzed, and health differences among infants, children, and adults who have been vaccinated and those who have not are presented and put in context.

Readers will find information on:

The infant/child vaccination schedule

Thimerosal in vaccines

Live virus vaccines

The human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine

Vaccination and Gulf War illness

Influenza (flu) vaccines

Hepatitis B vaccination

The COVID-19 vaccine

Vaccines during pregnancy

Given the massive push to vaccinate the entire global population, this book is timely and necessary for individuals to make informed choices for themselves and their families.

‘Vax-Unvax: Let the Science Speak’ Hits No. 11 on New York Times Best Sellers List

“Vax-Unvax: Let the Science Speak” — the new book by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Brian Hooker, Ph.D. — summarizes in lay terms about 60 studies conducted prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, and another 30 studies conducted during the pandemic that compared health outcomes between vaccinated and unvaccinated subjects.

Miss a day, miss a lot. Subscribe to The Defender’s Top News of the Day. It’s free.

By Suzanne Burdick, Ph.D.

Only 10 days after its release, “Vax-Unvax: Let the Science Speak,” — the new book by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Brian Hooker, Ph.D. — ranked No. 11 on The New York Times Best Sellers list.

Published Aug. 29, “Vax-Unvax” summarizes in lay terms about 60 studies conducted prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, and another 30 studies conducted during the pandemic, that compared health outcomes between vaccinated and unvaccinated subjects.

Kennedy is Children Health’s Defense (CHD) founder and chairman on leave. Hooker is CHD’s chief scientific officer. The Times’ ranking reflects the unit sales of a book as reported confidentially by a “comprehensive” network of book vendors across the U.S. Commenting on the news, Kennedy tweeted: Hooker told The Defender, “I couldn’t be happier about the exposure this important book is getting. The New York Times ranking is simply overwhelming.”

‘Studies were hiding in plain sight’

“Vax-Unvax” reports on the studies the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) “refused to do,” Hooker wrote in an article about why he and Kennedy undertook the project.

According to Hooker, the CDC has the ability to compare vaccinated versus unvaccinated children using its private database, the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD).

VSD holds records from more than 10 million people — including 2 million children, some of whom are unvaccinated.

“Yet the CDC has never compared the health outcomes of vaccinated children to completely unvaccinated children, and the agency won’t give independent researchers access to the VSD to complete such a study,” Hooker said.

So, he and Kennedy worked together to produce a compendium of studies, Hooker added.

In an interview on the Kim Iversen Show, Hooker said when in 2019 he began reviewing the scientific literature for vaccinated vs. unvaccinated comparison studies, he anticipated that data on the subject would be difficult to find since the CDC had refused to sponsor such investigations.

But “lo and behold … there were studies hiding in plain sight,” he told Iversen.

Hooker made clear that he and Kennedy steered clear of giving medical advice in the book. Their purpose was to “distill down the science,” he said, particularly around adverse events, long-term harm and the chronic disorders that can follow vaccination. For instance, a key takeaway from the book came from comparing children who had received all the shots on the CDC’s schedule of recommended childhood vaccines to those who were unvaccinated or were unvaccinated only during the first year of life.

“Overwhelmingly the unvaccinated children were much healthier in terms of chronic illnesses, ailments as well as infectious disease,” Hooker told Iversen. “And so to me, that was a very, very stark contrast because vaccination has been a part of the fabric of society in the United States for a very, very long time,” he added.

In some studies, he said, children who got all the vaccines on the schedule had more respiratory infections, more pneumonia and more ear infections. Another key takeaway of the book is the “extreme nature” of injuries associated with the COVID-19 vaccine, Hooker told Iversen. The book highlights more than 30 studies showing “strong, significant relationships” between the COVID-19 vaccine and myocarditis, pericarditis, Bell’s palsy, shingles and other cardiac and neurological disorders.

COVID vaccines and pregnancy

Because the regulatory agencies recommended the COVID-19 vaccine to pregnant women without any supporting data, the book also addresses that topic, Hooker said.

Marianne Skolek-Perez, who reviewed the book for The Washington Standard, said she was “particularly intrigued” by this section of the book.

Skolek-Perez, whose daughter died after being prescribed OxyContin, has written at length about the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) culpability in the opioid epidemic. She said “Vax-Unvax” contained “very eye-opening” information about the COVID-19 vaccines and pregnancy.

For instance, she said, although pregnant women were encouraged to get COVID-19 vaccines, the Pfizer package insert states that available data is insufficient to inform vaccine-associated risks in pregnancy.

“The FDA-approved Moderna COVID-19 vaccine provides an identical disclosure. Pfizer and Moderna did not conduct any clinical trials for pregnant women,” she said.

Skolek-Perez encouraged people to read the book to “thoroughly understand not just the present, but the future outcome of the repercussions of these vaccines on pregnancy.”

The Defender on occasion posts content related to Children’s Health Defense’s nonprofit mission that features Mr. Kennedy’s views on the issues CHD and The Defender regularly cover. In keeping with Federal Election Commission rules, this content does not represent an endorsement of Mr. Kennedy, who is on leave from CHD and is seeking the Democratic nomination for president of the U.S.

Brian Hooker Discusses Vaxxed vs Unvaxxed

Watch: CHD’s Brian Hooker Talks ‘Vax-Unvax’ With Kim Iversen (video at link) 8/31/23

On Wednesday’s episode of The Kim Iversen Show, journalist Kim Iversen and Children’s Health Defense’s Brian Hooker, Ph.D., discussed the key findings linking vaccines to short- and long-term adverse outcomes outlined in “Vax-Unvax: Let the Science Speak,” the new book Hooker co-authored with Robert. F. Kennedy Jr.

Miss a day, miss a lot. Subscribe to The Defender’s Top News of the Day. It’s free.

By Brenda Baletti, Ph.D.

When Brian Hooker, Ph.D., began surveying the scientific literature in 2019 for published studies comparing health outcomes of vaccinated individuals to those who were unvaccinated, he thought that data would be hard to find.

That’s because federal agencies like the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) refuse to sponsor such research or give independent researchers access to that data, which the CDC collects in its Vaccine Safety Datalink. But, Hooker, senior director of science and research at Children’s Health Defense (CHD), on Wednesday appeared on “The Kim Iversen Show,” where he told journalist Kim Iversen, “Lo and behold … there were studies hiding in plain sight.”

Hooker and Robert F. Kennedy Jr., CHD’s chairman on leave, found about 60 studies conducted prior to

the COVID-19 pandemic and about 30 related to COVID-19 with a “vax-unvax” comparison.

They summarized the studies for the general public and published them in their new book “Vax-Unvax: Let the Science Speak.” Iversen asked Hooker why the federal government wouldn’t do these kinds of studies or make the data available. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Hooker said, should be doing post-approval studies on risks associated with individual vaccines and groups of vaccines given together, but “they’ve been woefully asleep at the wheel.”

“It seems like they’re trying to eliminate the control group” of unvaccinated individuals.

As justification, he said, “You hear this mantra that it’s somehow amoral to withhold life-saving vaccinations” from those in the control group, “specifically to children, and now to adults” with COVID-19.

In the case of COVID-19, Hooker said, Pfizer started off its study with a control group, but then offered the vaccine to the people in the control group only six months into the study. That effectively eliminated the control group.

One of the key takeaways of the book is the “extreme nature” of injuries associated with the COVID-19 vaccine, Hooker told Iversen. The book highlights over 30 studies showing “strong, significant relationships” between the COVID-19 vaccine and myocarditis, pericarditis, Bell’s palsy, shingles and other cardiac and neurological disorders.

Because the regulatory agencies recommended the COVID-19 vaccine to pregnant women without any supporting data, the book also addresses that topic, Hooker said.

“Isn’t that insane?” Iversen asked, “I mean, insane to tell [that to] pregnant women. Pregnant women are typically the most protected group of people. And instead they’re like, ‘Oh, we never did any test, but go ahead, take it. I’m sure it’s fine.’ I mean, unbelievable.”

Asked why he thought the vaccines were pushed with so little data, Hooker cited several reasons.

Pfizer, he said, “had 56 billion reasons” — and they make payments to the FDA, which has a conflict of interest, Hooker said. “There is an ideology that is ‘vaccinate, vaccinate, vaccinate — that is how we get ourselves out of a pandemic,’” he said, and that ideology displaced any focus on early treatments.

Hooker also believes there were more insidious forces at play, for example those tied to the concentration of private power at the World Health Organization, which receives a lot of funding from Bill Gates.

Vax vs. unvax: the childhood schedule

Another key takeaway from the book, Hooker said, came from comparing children who had received all the shots on the CDC’s schedule of recommended childhood vaccines to those who were unvaccinated, or were unvaccinated only during the first year of life.

“Overwhelmingly the unvaccinated children were much healthier in terms of chronic illnesses, ailments as well as infectious disease,” Hooker said. “And so to me, that was a very, very stark contrast because vaccination has been a part of the fabric of society in the United States for a very, very long time,” he added.

In some studies, he said, children who got all the vaccines on the schedule had more respiratory infections, more pneumonia and more ear infections.

Iversen asked whether there was a “cutoff,” a time when that finding was untrue, before the CDC added so many vaccines to the schedule. Surely, she said, there were some vaccines that were beneficial to children. “It’s hard for me to just imagine we’ve been gaslit completely, and vaccines are just totally and completely useless, and it’s just a money-making scheme by Big Pharma,” she said.

Hooker said the problem is with so few studies, it is difficult to determine if there was a cutoff. But he suggested that cutoff might have coincided with the passage of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, which gave legal immunity to pharmaceutical companies for injury and damages associated with their vaccines. “After that, the pharmaceutical industry started to add more and more vaccines to the schedule in conjunction with the Centers for Disease Control,” he said.

Before the Vaccine Act, children received 11 vaccines. Now, he said, there are over 53 — and 21 of those are administered during the first year of life. “Overwhelmingly the unvaccinated children were much healthier in terms of chronic illnesses, ailments as well as infectious disease,” Hooker said. “And so to me, that was a very, very stark contrast because vaccination has been a part of the fabric of society in the United States for a very, very long time,” he added. In some studies, he said, children who got all the vaccines on the schedule had more respiratory infections, more pneumonia and more ear infections.

Iversen asked whether there was a “cutoff,” a time when that finding was untrue, before the CDC added so many vaccines to the schedule. Surely, she said, there were some vaccines that were beneficial to children. “It’s hard for me to just imagine we’ve been gaslit completely, and vaccines are just totally and completely useless, and it’s just a money-making scheme by Big Pharma,” she said.

Hooker said the problem is with so few studies, it is difficult to determine if there was a cutoff. But he suggested that cutoff might have coincided with the passage of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, which gave legal immunity to pharmaceutical companies for injury and damages associated with their vaccines. “After that, the pharmaceutical industry started to add more and more vaccines to the schedule in conjunction with the Centers for Disease Control,” he said.

Before the Vaccine Act, children received 11 vaccines. Now, he said, there are over 53 — and 21 of those are administered during the first year of life.

“I think you have a very valid point that at some point there was a benefit,” Hooker said. “But now I think that we’re looking at diminishing returns.” “And we’re also looking at untested protocols of giving infants as young as 2 months of age, six vaccines — six different needle sticks — all in the same visit,” he added, “and that’s never really been studied.”

Hooker and Iversen also discussed vaccines that are effective at preventing the diseases they are designed to prevent, such as the measles vaccine, and those that are ineffective at doing so, like pertussis. But, Hooker said, improvements in public health, such as better sanitation, had put a lot of these diseases — and mortality associated with them — in decline even before the vaccines were introduced.

So, he said, it is important to back up and look at the entire construct being used to determine whether vaccination is warranted. Hooker said he and Kennedy don’t give medical advice in the book. Their purpose was to “distill down the science,” he said, particularly around adverse events, long-term harm and the chronic disorders that can follow vaccination.

Vaxxed/Unvaxxed Studies By Dr. Paul Thomas

Dr. Paul Thomas (affectionately known as “Dr. Paul”) received his MD from Dartmouth Medical School and completed his pediatric residency at the University of California, San Diego. He launched a landmark study comparing the health of vaccinated kids to that of unvaccinated kids. The study shows conclusively that unvaccinated kids are far healthier in every way as shown by the charts in the first video below.

Dr. Paul Thomas on the suspension of his license 5 days after his “vaxxed vs. unvaxxed” study

?

Dr. Paul Thomas Targeted By Medical Board & Media After Landmark Vaccine Study – Interview

?

Recently a landmark study was conducted by Dr. James Lyons-Weiler and Dr. Paul Thomas. The study compared vaccinated children and unvaccinated children and was published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health on November 22, 2020 after being peer reviewed.

Vaccine Study Costs Doctor His License

Oregon Pediatrician Dr. Paul Thomas, MD has come under fire by the Oregon Medical Board for providing informed consent to his patients. After publishing a study using the data from his more than 13,000 patients, the Oregon Medical, in an attempt to silence the highly-controversial study results, suspended his license.

?

Dr. Paul is accepting donations for his campaign at Dr. Paul’s Fight.

Film — Vaxxed: From Coverup to Catastrophe

Del Bigtree, host of The Highwire, was an Emmy Award-winning producer of “The Doctors” TV show. He left TV to produce the 2016 documentary Vaxxed: From Coverup To Catastrophe which went viral! It documents the disclosure of a CDC whistleblower about the connection between the MMR vaccine and the explosion of autism. The film confirms the findings of British MD Andrew Wakefield.

?

NEW STUDY SUGGESTS COVID SHOT ALTERING KIDS’ IMMUNE SYSTEMS 9/8/23

?

SUSPICIOUS TIMING: UK’S COLOSSAL RISE IN CHILD DEATH 9/8/23

On the cusp of the new COVID-19 booster shot rollout, former BlackRock Portfolio Manager, Edward Dowd, gives Del a shocking update highlighting the colossal rise of excess deaths in children in the UK since the COVID vaccine was rolled out.

?

The Vaccine Secrets video from Children’s Health Defense is a shocking expose about vaccines. It explains that it was improved sanitation and nutrition that led to the decline of diseases rather than vaccines and explains the many dangers of vaccines.