High Levels of “Forever Chemicals” (aka PFAS) Detected in Some Fitness Tracker/Smartwatches; Ditto on High Levels of Radiation

By B.N. Frank

Concerns about exposure to PFAS (also known as “Forever Chemicals”) continue to increase, and rightfully so. Additionally, decades of research have revealed that exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMF) from activity trackers and other wearables, cell phones, as well as other wireless sources – including Bluetooth and 5G – is biologically harmful. In fact, manufacturers are required to provide consumers with warnings about radiation emissions from all wireless products! Additionally, in 2021, a federal court ruled in favor of petitioners who sued the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) for NOT updating wireless radiation guidelines since 1996 and the agency refuses to comply with the court order (see 1, 2, 3, 4)!

Nevertheless, wireless aka “smart” wearables continue to be manufactured and recommended for a variety of purposes including health and medical. Perhaps wearers will be less jazzed about them now that researchers are raising a red flag about high levels of PFAS in some wristbands.

From Eureka Alert:

News Release 18-Dec-2024

Researchers detect elevated levels of PFAS in some fitness tracker and smartwatch bands

Peer-Reviewed Publication

University of Notre Dame

Fitness trackers and smartwatch bands are the latest consumer products found to contain per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), according to new research from the University of Notre Dame.

In a study published in Environmental Science & Technology Letters on Wednesday, researchers tested 22 watch bands purchased in the U.S. from various brands and at a range of price points. Many of the bands were manufactured using fluoroelastomers, a synthetic polymer used to make rubber material resistant to sweat, skin oils and lotions. Results showed that nine of the 22 bands tested contained elevated levels of a type of PFAS called perfluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA). Elevated levels of PFHxA were more prevalent in higher-priced watchbands, or those costing more than $15.

The study is the first to address PFAS in fitness trackers and smartwatch bands.

“The most remarkable thing we found in this study was the very high concentrations of just one PFAS — there were some samples above 1,000 parts per billion of PFHxA, which is much higher than most PFAS we have seen in consumer products,” said Graham Peaslee, co-author of the study and professor emeritus in the Department of Physics and Astronomy.

PFAS have been widely used in consumer and industrial product applications since the 1950s. With a nearly unbreakable chemical structure, they do not degrade or break down, contaminating soil and groundwater systems and persisting in the environment for decades — earning them the name “forever chemicals.” Manufacturers use forever chemicals to make products resistant to water, heat and stains. Over the years Peaslee and his lab have detected PFAS in several industrial and consumer products, including fast-food wrappers, cosmetics, feminine hygiene products, eye drops, dental floss, plastic containers, textiles, firefighter gear and artificial turf.

The chemicals also migrate from treated surfaces onto skin and into dust and air, creating multiple paths of exposure including inhalation, ingestion and dermal absorption. Peaslee and his team cited this as a significant concern regarding wearable consumer products.

“Few studies so far have been published regarding the dermal absorption of PFAS,” said Alyssa Wicks, a graduate student in Peaslee’s lab and lead author of the study. “One article published earlier this year by a European research group found that a couple types of PFAS had significant transfer through the skin. That initial study only examined around 20 of the 14,000 known types of PFAS, and more studies are needed to better understand how PFAS travel through the skin.”

An estimated 1 in 5 Americans wear smartwatches or fitness trackers, according to a 2019 Pew Research study. Another study found consumers wear their wearables an average of 11 hours per day.

Peaslee’s lab tested samples using particle-induced gamma-ray emission ion beam analysis and liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry to determine the material’s total fluorine content and identify the specific type of PFAS present. High fluorine levels are a telltale sign of the presence of PFAS.

New and used bands were included in the study. The samples were also broken down by price point. Bands with price points less than $15 were listed as “inexpensive,” while those between $15 and $30 were considered “midrange” and those more than $30 were classified as “expensive.” Three of the bands tested were considered expensive, and all three contained significantly elevated levels of fluorine.

“Fifteen of the 22 bands we tested had a high percentage of total fluorine concentrations, and nine contained PFHxA,” Wicks said. “The others used some other unidentified surfactant that wasn’t in our targeted analysis.”

All three of the bands identified at the expensive price point and 12 of the 14 bands at the midrange price point contained highly elevated quantities of measurable fluorine. All five inexpensive bands contained very little total fluorine, measuring less than 1 percent.

Forever chemicals have been linked to multiple health conditions including immunosuppression, hormonal dysregulation, developmental delays in children, low birth weight and accelerated puberty, high blood pressure in pregnant women, and an increased risk of certain cancers, such as kidney and testicular cancer.

Peaslee said the results suggest that a more comprehensive study is needed to test the levels of PFAS band wearers are exposed to.

Heather Whitehead, a Notre Dame graduate and former doctoral student in Peaslee’s lab, was also co-author of the study.

Read more about how Notre Dame is tackling the problem of forever chemicals.

Journal

Environmental Science & Technology Letters

DOI

10.1021/acs.estlett.4c00907

Article Title

Presence of Perfluorohexanoic Acid in Fluoroelastomer Watch Bands

Article Publication Date

18-Dec-2024

Disclaimer: AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert system.