By Neenah Payne
President Joe Biden, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Marianne Williamson are running this year as Democrats for the US presidency. However, the Democratic Party has banned debates! Interestingly, no incumbent president has participated in a primary debate since Ford. Democrats want to keep it that way.
However, that has not stopped RFK Jr. from debating and raising important issues in other ways – including through podcasts. As he shares information, Kennedy is changing many minds now. This article is not an endorsement of any political candidate; it is an examination of the public discussion of key issues that deeply affect us all but which were largely suppressed – especially during the “COVID era.”
RFK Jr. Blindsides Democrats in Congress – He Just Agreed to Explosive D.C. Showdown
Joe Rogan Challenges Dr. Peter Hotez To Debate RFK Jr.
Miss a day, miss a lot. Subscribe to The Defender’s Top News of the Day. It’s free.
In an appearance last week on “The Joe Rogan Experience,” Robert F. Kennedy Jr. laid out the case for thorough, scientifically sound safety testing of vaccines and greater transparency on the part of agencies responsible for approving and recommending the vaccines.
The show began trending on Twitter hours after the broadcast and continued driving heavy traffic for days afterward.
Kennedy, founder and chairman on leave from Children’s Health Defense (CHD), devoted most of the three-hour interview with Rogan to explaining why, after decades of successfully litigating cases against environmental polluters, he was compelled to take on Big Pharma, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration — initially, over the issue of mercury in vaccines.
It all started when a group of persistent women “scolded” him into reading the science on mercury in vaccines, and its impact on children’s neurological health and development.
He did. And what he discovered was enough to convince him that despite efforts by public health authorities to dismiss the women as “crazy,” they weren’t.
“They didn’t look crazy to me and they were rational,” Kennedy said. “They weren’t excitable and they had done their research. And I was like, I should be listening to these people even if they’re wrong. Somebody needs to listen to them.”
At the outset of the interview, Rogan admitted he previously dismissed Kennedy as a “fringy thinking, almost conspiracy theorist-type person,” because Rogan had bought into the narrative that vaccines were one of the “most important medical advancements in human history, saved countless lives, protected children.”
That was before he did his own homework — including reading Kennedy’s bestseller, “The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health.”
After reading the book, which contains more than 2,200 citations, Rogan said, he wondered if it was “possible this guy’s telling the truth? Is this possible that everyone that I know that had these strong opinions of you, that most of them, at least, were like me — they had formed these opinions through a glance at a headline, someone talking about you on a television show?”
Rogan said it wasn’t until the pandemic that he first started questioning the official narrative on vaccines, especially COVID-19 vaccines, and related public policies and narratives.
Rogan acknowledged the mainstream media’s boycott of Kennedy and his views and proceeded to allow Kennedy to speak, uninterrupted, on the topic.
Throughout the interview, Kennedy shared highlights from his decades of research into vaccine injuries and public health authorities’ suppression of any science, no matter how sound, suggesting vaccines cause harm.
The interview prompted Rogan to challenge Dr. Peter Hotez to debate Kennedy. Rogan pledged to donate $100,000 to a charity of Hotez’s choice if he would appear on Rogan’s podcast with Kennedy.
The challenge triggered an avalanche of activity on Twitter, as others offered to up the ante — which at press time, had reached $2.62 million.
Joe Rogan, Elon Musk, and few others are bidding:
$2.62 Million for Vaccine Scientist Peter Hotez to debate RFK Jr.
The goal of the debate is to highlight:
• Misinformation
• Conspiracy theories
• And the safety of Covid 19 vaccines– Here's the breakdown: pic.twitter.com/SPhyYItwSC
— Dan (@danmurrayserter) June 20, 2023
Also Read: Joe Rogan challenges Dr. Peter Hotez to debate anti-vaxxer RFK Jr. on his podcast
RFK JR. ON PETER HOTEZ: ‘I DON’T THINK HE’D SURVIVE A DEBATE’
Robert F Kennedy, Jr., joins Del to address the Twitter-storm that erupted this week after his appearance on The Joe Rogan Experience. Rogan asked Dr. Peter Hotez to debate RFK Jr., pledging $100,000 to the charity of Hotez’s choosing. This came after Hotez put out a tweet saying he was upset with Kennedy being allowed on Rogan’s show. Others joined the charity pledge, and now more than $2.6 million is on the line. RFK Jr. explains why he thinks Hotez will never debate him.
Many articles say Dr. Hotez should not debate RFK Jr. Here are some that think he should.
The Daily Beast: Here’s Why Legitimate Scientists Should Debate RFK Jr.
New York Times: Go Ahead. Debate Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
The Atlantic: Joe Rogan, RFK Jr., and the Debates Worth Having
The podcast host Joe Rogan made news this week by offering the vaccine scientist Peter Hotez $100,000 to be donated to a charity of his choosing if he participated in a no-time-limit debate with the vaccine skeptic (and 2024 presidential candidate) Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Hotez has appeared on Rogan’s podcast before, and says he would be happy to return and to talk one-on-one with the host about vaccines, but he declined to participate in a debate, likening such an event to a Jerry Springer episode. MSNBC’s Medhi Hasan, the author of the best-selling book Win Every Argument: The Art of Debating, Persuading, and Public Speaking, endorsed that decision, arguing that “experts” should not debate “cranks” and analogizing the situation to a historian of World War II debating a Holocaust denier.
BBC: RFK Jr wasn’t campaigning as an anti-vaxxer – until Rogan controversy
Robert F Kennedy Jr has downplayed his anti-vaccine views in his run for the US presidency, but a podcast appearance has put them front and centre once again. Mr Kennedy, who’s seeking the Democratic party nomination for president, is facing controversy after raising his anti-vaccine views on the Joe Rogan podcast. He appeared on the massively popular series – known for its wide-ranging conversations and a range of guests, including a number with controversial or pseudoscientific views – last Thursday.
Aaron Siri: Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN)
In the videos below, attorney Aaron Siri, Managing Partner at Siri & Glimstad, explains the many problems with the way vaccines are handled now. This information will be shocking to people who have been led to believe all vaccines are necessary, safe, and effective.
Siri’s firm works closely with the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) created by Del Bigtree, host of The Highwire which airs online Thursdays from 2-4 PM ET. Siri has been celebrated in the corporate media for his growing victories for ICAN over the last few years. Newly filed tax records show that ICAN, one of the country’s best-funded anti-vaccine organizations, saw a 60 percent jump in revenue in 2020. The Washington Post reported in 2021 about ICAN: Resistance to vaccine mandates is building. A powerful network is helping.
Bigtree was the producer of the 2016 film Vaxxed: From Coverup To Catastrophe which went viral. The documentary alleges that the CDC, the government agency charged with protecting the health of American citizens, destroyed data on their 2004 study that allegedly showed a link between the MMR vaccine and autism.
The film was directed by British MD Andrew Wakefield who was among the first to make a possible connection between the MMR shot and autism after many mothers consulted him about problems their kids had after getting the shot. Like Kennedy, Wakefield was drawn into the vaccine controversy by mothers looking for solutions for kids whom they believe had been injured by vaccines.
Vaxxed shows that Dr. William Thompson was a CDC whistleblower who came forward with physical documents and data that strongly indicate the CDC illegally manipulated the data on the MMR study. He has alleged that during the study highly significant increases in the risk of autism were found in several distinct populations and the CDC did everything from kicking children off the study to throwing data out in order to cover it up.
Why a Judge Ordered FDA to Release Covid-19 Vaccine Data Pronto
COVID-19 vaccine claims yield small payouts from U.S. government
Meet the brilliant mind behind one of the most successful and active Legal Teams in the world of Vaccine and Civil Rights. Aaron provides legal insight on Covid vaccine mandates, shocking childhood vaccines, the Plotkin Deposition, and more.
AARON SIRI PT 1: WHY ARE VACCINE MANUFACTURERS THE MOST PROTECTED COMPANIES IN AMERICA?
When we finally had that data, you got a sense of why they didn’t want the public to have it, because it showed that 7.7 percent of the over 10 million V-safe users reported needing medical care after a COVID-19 vaccine.”
Aaron Siri, managing partner at Siri & Glimstad, has led several high-profile lawsuits against vaccine manufacturers and federal health agencies since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. “If they prevail … in five to 10 years, what will happen is it will reset the normal health baseline in America for heart issues, cardiovascular issues, right? That will be the new normal,” Siri says.
In this comprehensive two-part interview, Aaron Siri breaks down how vaccine manufacturers secured unprecedented protections from liability three decades ago. “There is no other product that I’m aware of that is afforded this level of protection,” Siri explains. “When you look around you, all the products you experience every day, they’re safer because the manufacturer is worried about liability.”
Siri was always told that vaccines are safe. But if a product is safe, he explains—at least in the way that public health agencies project it to be safe to the public—the injuries would be exceedingly rare, and thus, there would be no need for the manufacturer to be granted immunity from liability. “They were going to stop producing those vaccines because they could not make a profit because the amount of liability they had to pay exceeded the revenue,” Siri says. “You learn things along the way that you just can’t unlearn.
AARON SIRI PT 2: HOW THE VACCINE PARADIGM HAS LED TO MEDICAL COERCION AND CONFLICTED HEALTH AGENCIES
I was always told that vaccines are safe. And if a product is safe, why do you need to give the manufacturer … essentially immunity to liability for the injuries that that product causes? Because if it’s safe, certainly in the way that our public health authorities project it safe to the public, there shouldn’t be any injuries, or there should be one in a million, as you often hear.”
Previously, in part one ( https://www.bitchute.com/video/vtDBN7Rx4WqK/ ) of my interview with Aaron Siri, managing partner at Siri and Glimstad, he broke down how vaccine manufacturers secured unprecedented protections from liability three decades ago.
“COVID vaccines didn’t enter into a vacuum. They were rolled into a very long established paradigm and way things are done,” says Siri. “They had a narrative around natural immunity that they determined fit in with their policy. And then the studies followed to make it fit.”
In part two, we discuss natural immunity from COVID-19 and what he discovered in the clinical safety trials of other vaccines, such as one of the Hepatitis B products: “147 kids. Five days of safety monitoring after injection. There’s no indication there was a control group,” says Siri.
“COVID-19 vaccines—they were called ‘rushed.’ They said the clinical trials were rushed. They said development was rushed. But the reality is the clinical trials for the COVID-19 vaccines that the average American received, compared to the clinical trials for almost every childhood vaccine, were the most robust studies that have been done on vaccines.”
We also look at the conflicts of interest between America’s health agencies and pharmaceutical companies. “Think about this business model. You have a vaccine. You can’t be sued for harms. You have a guaranteed market because kids are required to get it for school. And your health agencies promote it for you and defend against any harm,” says Siri.
Neenah Payne writes for Activist Post
Become a Patron!
Or support us at SubscribeStar
Donate cryptocurrency HERE
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Follow us on SoMee, Telegram, HIVE, Flote, Minds, MeWe, Twitter, Gab, and What Really Happened.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.
Be the first to comment on "Should Dr. Peter Hotez Debate Robert F. Kennedy Jr.?"