By B.N. Frank
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is not a health or environmental agency. In the 1990s, they replaced the EPA as the regulatory body appointed to protect Americans from the telecom industry. Unfortunately, they HAVE catered to the industry instead AND they have become more dangerous since Trump was elected (see 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11). Despite research proving harm, the agency refuses to update 24-year-old federal RF radiation exposure guidelines.
Lawsuits have been filed against the FCC for NOT protecting the public from unsafe levels of radiation as well as 5G on Earth (see 1, 2, 3, 4, 5) and in space. Environmental Health Trust and Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) are two organizations that have filed. In a recent newsletter, Environmental Health Trust draws attention to this:
The National Resources Defense Counsel (NRDC) submitted a must read Amicus Brief supporting our historic lawsuit against the Federal Communications Commission (FCC).
In fact, four incredible amicus briefs were filed in support of EHT et al., v. FCC and each one eloquently describes why the FCC must revise its decades-old outdated wireless radiation limits. Each one is a treasure.
We are so thankful to NRDC, the Building Biology Institute, Attorney Joe Sandri, Dan and Catherine Kleiber, and all the public officials who took the time to share important information with the court. And we are thankful to you for your sustaining support of our mission.
We want you to read their words
“The present FCC thermal regulation, in addition to lacking any sound scientific foundation, as pointed out by Petitioners, is perpetrating a continuing, ever-expanding, and cruel injustice.” – Building Biology Institute
“Overall, the NTP findings demonstrate the potential for RFR to cause cancer in humans.” – Dr. Linda Birnbaum, former director of the National Institutes of Environmental Health Sciences and National Toxicology Program
“Because the FCC is not primarily a health care or an environmental protection agency it has a special duty to review the work of experts from those fields and also a duty to make written requests to the various expert agencies. … It does not appear that the FCC provided evidence that it met minimal requirements to review the record in this proceeding, let alone that it even wrote numerous agencies of subject matter expertise, seeking their input.” – Attorney Joe Sandri
“The FCC is obligated to prepare an EIS (environmental impact study) due to both the differing environmental and public health impacts engendered by the choice between keeping RF/MW limits the same vs. lowering them and the vastly disparate energy footprint of wired vs. wireless technologies and the implications for the future survival of the human race.” – Dan and Catherine Kleiber
“The FCC stuck its head in the sand and did not even mention many of these studies of potential environmental harm in its 2019 order … As the 5G buildout continues, Americans are forced to live with involuntary 24/7 radiation.” – National Resources Defense Counsel and elected officials from California, Maryland, Massachusetts and Hawaii.
High-speed internet CAN be obtained without 5G and even without wireless. According to FCC Chairman Ajit Pai – and a different LAWSUIT filed against the agency – all Americans have paid to have this already.
There IS research that has determined 5G is NOT safe. In fact, cities AND entire countries have taken action to ban, delay, halt, and limit installation AS WELL AS issue moratoriums on deployment. In the U.S. 5G lawsuits have been filed by municipalities against the FCC.
Municipal legislators have passed resolutions to ban 5G until studies prove it’s safe (see 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6) and ordinances to limit and/or control installation. State representatives in Hawaii and Illinois have introduced 5G bills to protect constituents. Congress members have confronted the FCC with their concerns (see 1, 2). American opposition also includes federal agencies and other experts who warn 5G could threaten national security, public safety, and weather forecasting accuracy (see 1, 2, 3).
The majority of scientists worldwide oppose 5G until there are studies proving it isn’t unsafe. Doctors and scientists have asked for moratoriums on Earth and in space (see 1, 2). Since 2018 there have been reports of people and animals experiencing symptoms and illnesses after 5G was installed (see 1, 2, 3, 4). However, exposure risks aren’t exclusive to 5G. Last year the World Health Organization warned that high levels of Electromagnetic Fields (aka “Electrosmog”) could cause health issues in a significant percentage of the population. Doctors and scientists – including the American Academy of Pediatrics – insist that exposure to ALL sources of wireless radiation is harmful (see also 1, 2). The FCC continues deferring to industry-paid consultants and forcing unsafe and unwanted technology on Americans instead. Trump seems to have bought into all of this as well. So much for giving the country back to the people…
Activist Post reports regularly about 5G and other unsafe technology. For more information visit our archives and the following websites.
- 5GCrisis
- 5GFree
- 5G Information
- Whatis5G.Info
- Wireless Information Network
- Environmental Health Trust
- Physicians for Safe Technology
- 5G Space Appeal
- Stop 5G International
- The 5G Summit
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE! Follow us on SoMee, HIVE, Parler, Flote, Minds, and Twitter.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.
Be the first to comment on "Natural Resources Defense Council: The FCC “Has Failed to Protect the Public from Radiofrequency Emissions”"