By B.N. Frank
In 2019, telecom executives gave U.S. congressional testimony that they had NO scientific evidence that 5G is safe.
The majority of scientists worldwide are opposed to 5G until studies show that it’s safe.
There IS also research already that has determined that 5G is NOT safe. In fact, there is also research that shows exposure to other sources of wireless radiation – not just 5G – is NOT safe.
Of course, 5G opposition is about a whole lot more than health and environmental risks (see 1, 2, 3, 4, 5). It is noteworthy, though, that there have been reports of people and animals becoming sick after 5G was installed and turned on (see 1, 2, 3, 4).
Become an Activist Post Patron for $1 per month at Patreon.
Cities worldwide AND entire countries taking action to ban, delay, halt, and limit installation AS WELL AS issue moratoriums.
Thanks to “Dilbert” for wanting to study 5G first before writing an article about it.
Too bad The New York Times didn’t seem to do the same. Maybe it’s because of their 2019 partnership with Verizon to build a 5G journalism lab. D’oh!
Activist Post reports regularly about 5G and other unsafe technology. For more information, visit our archives and the following websites:
- 5GCrisis
- 5GFree
- 5G Information
- 5G Space Appeal
- The 5G Summit
- Electromagnetic Radiation Safety
- Environmental Health Trust
- Physicians for Safe Technology
- TelecomPowerGrab.com
- Wireless Information Network
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE! Follow us on SoMee, HIVE, Parler, Flote, Minds, and Twitter.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.
Be the first to comment on "“Dilbert” on Writing a 5G Article — “Maybe I Should Study It First”"