This little-known organization is older than the United Nations and The League of Nations. In fact, it appears to be the first world government group that appeared in the modern era. Aaron Dykes covers the history of their plan.
Roosevelt, Edith K. “Little Known World Parliament Group Pushes Along” Tallahassee Democrat, Sun, Oct 7, 1962 https://www.newspapers.com/newspage/2…
Aaron & Melissa Dykes are the founders of TruthstreamMedia.com, Subscribe to them on YouTube, like on Facebook, follow on Twitter, support on Patreon.
Watch their mini-documentary Obsolete here.
Guess what sheeple, there is not a GD frelling thing “We the People” cannot do anything about unless we start a totally shooting war.
Logical fallacy there, bub. I know that it’s probably tough, if not impossible to accept a giant, glaring flaw in your plan, but let me point it out anyway:
Our government is the ultimate firearms dealer. Hence, you and all the other gun slingers in the country, nay, WORLD would be easily outgunned in a “shooting war.”
I am not going down without a fight and will not be taken ALIVE
I believe you, Richard.
There’s a problem with your misinformation. You assume 2 things. 1, you assume that the entirety of those in our government would stand united against the people. This is a serious flaw, has it is well known that roughly 50% will defy orders and will cause fractioning and infighting within the government if the order to wage war on the American people is ever given. Assumption #2 is that the “ultimate firearms dealer” outnumbers the people they would oppress. This also is patently false. The people outnumber the government over 20-1, and given the obvious infighting and resistance from within, by 40 or 50 to 1. What this means is that if there ever IS a “shooting war”, all we would need is a fraction of cohesive action and we would dominate them unquestioningly. If all we manage is to kill 1 of them for every 2 of us that gives their lives for freedom, we will defeat tyranny overwhelmingly.
We just need a sense of unity and purpose and we are unbeatable.
Interesting points you make there, thank you for the thoughtful reply. I hear you on the lack of absolute unity within govt. ranks, and you are correct, I think, in presuming that some folks might be inclined to stand with the people. Touché.
I suppose my second, less obvious concern in this scenario is that violence is ultimately the language the state speaks most fluently, concisely, and potently; they are masters of twisting it to manipulate outcomes (never mind that violence often produces the least creative, most destructive results). While this isn’t to say that the “people” – if you can manage and unite them into any sort of an organized group – don’t easily outnumber government officials, what of a scenario in which the govt. turns its own WMDs against a large fraction of the people? After, it would be claimed those people were terrorists (or whichever retroactive backstory was most convenient); such an event would provide a tasty excuse for invoking martial law (or much worse) upon the remaining people, no?
I am legitimately curious for your thoughts on this — you seem to have a rational head on your shoulders. (Most discussions of this nature never make it past someone like R’s comment, below, referencing their own desire to die fighting.)
I’m not sure why this was detected as spam…censored, perhaps?
Will repost…
As far as using “wmd’s on the people”, we know that they would in fact do this, and in turn blame it on the people themselves (a false flag disguised in the media as terrorism – the play book doesn’t have many new plays in it). It will likely come down to a multifaceted approach utilizing the tools they so effectively use against us. Propaganda campaigns (although the side on which the people would be fighting, truth would be a more apt name) would be essential. If you’ve ever seen the last “Hunger Games” movie, at the end where you realize that the “good guys” were using the same weapons the government uses by targeting their own people in order to blame the “bad guys”, you understand what I mean here.
Unfortunately, this type of action may be necessary. As soon as we declare a tool “off limits” which our enemy won’t hesitate to use, we put ourselves at a disadvantage and any time you’re at a tactical disadvantage, you do down in history as the loser and the terrorist. In addition to a successful “hearts and minds” campaign, it may also require a good old fashioned “shooting war”. If history has taught us anything, it has taught us that kindness, begging, and pleading of governments often yields little in terms of real results. The most effective changes, governmentally speaking, have ALWAYS resulted in someone in power dangling at the end of a noose or with their head in a basket beneath a guillotine. This is the sad reality.
It has been spoken on innumerous times, from Jefferson stating “From time to time the tree of liberty must be nourished with the blood of patriots and tyrants”, to even Mahatma Gandhi saying “‘Among the many misdeeds of the British rule in India, history will look back upon the Act depriving the whole nation of arms as the blackest”. Even the world’s foremost champion of peace understood the need for a people to be armed to defend themselves against tyranny. It is even spelled out in the Declaration of Independence where it says “it is their right, it is their DUTY to cast off” such governments. You don’t nicely ask a bee to stop stinging you, you swat it away with violence.
There is a real and logical use for violence. Where I have no desire to kill anyone, nor to be killed myself, I can understand the precedence and what history has taught us. We may have to fight, and have a good old fashioned “shooting war” to usher in a new golden age. Things are always darkest before the dawn, so they say, and things are pretty dark at the moment. We may have to call upon ALL the tools and gifts God has given us, and to even invent some new ones, to return our country to a constitutional republic no longer governed by private banking entities and corporations. The minute we declare a tool off limits because of our “superior morality”, we will carry that superior morality all the way to our graves with us, ensuring our surviving children and grandchildren will live forever in chains.
This is the real, as I see it.
At the end of the day, I can also see the problem as being largely systemic in nature. We all currently live on a giant tax farm. We are cattle and sheep to feed the elite. A revolution, even if successful, might simply end up “replacing the farmer”. It will make little difference if we end up as cattle again in the new farmer’s field. Systemic changes must occur to save the country (and, indeed, the world). This is where it gets difficult. By and large, psychologically speaking we are tied intrinsically to a series of “isms”. Socialism, fascism, collectivism, individualism, et al. We may have to endeavor to establish a new, as of yet unheard of system to govern the affairs of planet earth. This can be the most difficult of all, because all of our current systems are overlaps of one another. What our “democracy” looks like now isn’t far from Communism, so the leap isn’t difficult. Where it gets difficult is casting off EVERYTHING and beginning anew. There are many ideologies on how to go about this, the “Star Trek” like system being simply one, to abandon the notion of money all together. But all boundaries are merely conventions, and to transcend any boundary, one merely has to be able to envision it.
Good luck.
I will keep reposting this you silly little f**ks.
I’m not sure why this was detected as spam…censored, perhaps?
Will repost…
As far as using “wmd’s on the people”, we know that they would in fact do this, and in turn blame it on the people themselves (a false flag disguised in the media as terrorism – the play book doesn’t have many new plays in it). It will likely come down to a multifaceted approach utilizing the tools they so effectively use against us. Propaganda campaigns (although the side on which the people would be fighting, truth would be a more apt name) would be essential. If you’ve ever seen the last “Hunger Games” movie, at the end where you realize that the “good guys” were using the same weapons the government uses by targeting their own people in order to blame the “bad guys”, you understand what I mean here.
Unfortunately, this type of action may be necessary. As soon as we declare a tool “off limits” which our enemy won’t hesitate to use, we put ourselves at a disadvantage and any time you’re at a tactical disadvantage, you do down in history as the loser and the terrorist. In addition to a successful “hearts and minds” campaign, it may also require a good old fashioned “shooting war”. If history has taught us anything, it has taught us that kindness, begging, and pleading of governments often yields little in terms of real results. The most effective changes, governmentally speaking, have ALWAYS resulted in someone in power dangling at the end of a noose or with their head in a basket beneath a guillotine. This is the sad reality.
It has been spoken on innumerous times, from Jefferson stating “From time to time the tree of liberty must be nourished with the blood of patriots and tyrants”, to even Mahatma Gandhi saying “‘Among the many misdeeds of the British rule in India, history will look back upon the Act depriving the whole nation of arms as the blackest”. Even the world’s foremost champion of peace understood the need for a people to be armed to defend themselves against tyranny. It is even spelled out in the Declaration of Independence where it says “it is their right, it is their DUTY to cast off” such governments. You don’t nicely ask a bee to stop stinging you, you swat it away with violence.
There is a real and logical use for violence. Where I have no desire to kill anyone, nor to be killed myself, I can understand the precedence and what history has taught us. We may have to fight, and have a good old fashioned “shooting war” to usher in a new golden age. Things are always darkest before the dawn, so they say, and things are pretty dark at the moment. We may have to call upon ALL the tools and gifts God has given us, and to even invent some new ones, to return our country to a constitutional republic no longer governed by private banking entities and corporations. The minute we declare a tool off limits because of our “superior morality”, we will carry that superior morality all the way to our graves with us, ensuring our surviving children and grandchildren will live forever in chains.
This is the real, as I see it.
At the end of the day, I can also see the problem as being largely systemic in nature. We all currently live on a giant tax farm. We are cattle and sheep to feed the elite. A revolution, even if successful, might simply end up “replacing the farmer”. It will make little difference if we end up as cattle again in the new farmer’s field. Systemic changes must occur to save the country (and, indeed, the world). This is where it gets difficult. By and large, psychologically speaking we are tied intrinsically to a series of “isms”. Socialism, fascism, collectivism, individualism, et al. We may have to endeavor to establish a new, as of yet unheard of system to govern the affairs of planet earth. This can be the most difficult of all, because all of our current systems are overlaps of one another. What our “democracy” looks like now isn’t far from Communism, so the leap isn’t difficult. Where it gets difficult is casting off EVERYTHING and beginning anew. There are many ideologies on how to go about this, the “Star Trek” like system being simply one, to abandon the notion of money all together. But all boundaries are merely conventions, and to transcend any boundary, one merely has to be able to envision it.
Good luck.
What happened? Was your comment censored??? And ty for reposting, if so — I haven’t read the bulk of your response yet/need to switch to a larger screen, I think, to take it in in earnest, but I really appreciate that you took the time to write a thoughtful response.
This all started when Woddie ‘the Treacherous’ Wilson gave up the unFed Reserveless b.s bank of the U.S. on 12/21/1913. The satanists have been steadily locking the handcuffs around the rest of us ever since.
End the Fed…Ron Paul
The Creature of Jekyll Island …G. Edward Griffin…”…can you say the biggest scam in the history of the United States…”
Tragedy and Hope…Quigly.
See JFK’s e/o 11110 – printing silver certificates.