Man Convicted For “Liking” Apparently Slanderous Facebook Comments

By Carey Wedler

In the United States, a crazed racist is currently facing murder charges for stabbing multiple men who attempted to stop him from harassing two teenage girls. In a court appearance, he justified his murder of two Americans, one a military veteran, by citing “free speech.”

On the other end of the spectrum, in Switzerland, a man was just convicted of liking Facebook comments that implied the plaintiff was racist, highlighting the potential dangers of regulating speech.

The Guardian reported:

According to a statement from the Zurich district court, the 45-year-old defendant accused an animal rights activist, Erwin Kessler, of racism and antisemitism and hit the ‘like’ button under several comments from third parties about Kessler that were deemed inflammatory.

The comments were made in 2015 during heated discussions on a range of Facebook groups about which animal welfare groups should be permitted to take part in a vegan street festival, the Swiss daily Tages Anzeiger reported.

Kessler was previously convicted under an anti-racism law almost twenty years ago and received a short prison sentence for “comparing Jewish ritual slaughter methods to Nazi practices,” a conviction already questionable in and of itself.

Kessler sued over a dozen Facebook commenters over their 2015 statements. The unnamed man convicted of liking comments was the only defendant found guilty without actually posting his own Facebook comments. The court ruled that “[b]y clicking the like button, ‘the defendant clearly endorsed the unseemly content and made it his own,’” as noted by the Guardian.

The court also determined that the defendant had insulted Kessler’s “honor” and, by liking the “unproven” comments, exposed their content to large numbers of people. The court ruled the defendant failed to prove the allegations were true.

The comment-liking defendant was fined 4,000 Swiss francs ($4,129 USD). Amr Abdelaziz, a lawyer for one of the defendants, said those convicted can appeal but it’s unlikely they will put in the time and resources to do so.

Though the conviction was made by a lower court, Abdelaziz believes it could still have profound implications across the country. He said the court needs to clarify whether liking Facebook comments “should be given the same weight as other forms of speech more commonly cited in defamation cases,” the Guardian reported.

“If the courts want to prosecute people for likes on Facebook, we could easily need to triple the number of judges in this country,” Abdelaziz said. “This could also obviously easily become an assault on the freedom of expression.”

Creative Commons / Anti-Media / Report a typo


Activist Post Daily Newsletter

Subscription is FREE and CONFIDENTIAL
Free Report: How To Survive The Job Automation Apocalypse with subscription

4 Comments on "Man Convicted For “Liking” Apparently Slanderous Facebook Comments"

  1. I don’t believe this story. I think it’s a psy op, to get people to believe a lie, so the so called “government’ (third party debt collectors) can convince people that “it” (the pirates) can go after “normal people” for their thoughts. There are no such ‘laws”. They are FAKE. Conditoning. Fake. Sherman Skolnick used to call the media ‘the liars and whores of the press”. Now I see that general statement is not exageration. The media is necessary for the new world order. Very dangerous LIARS.
    Judge Anna Riezinger – 02-20-2016 RBN (in Defence of Humanity …
    Video for judge anna riezinger in defense of humanity▶ 1:27:24
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lhFmhqG-ARw
    Feb 24, 2016 – Uploaded by liabilitymate
    Judge Anna Riezinger talks about the Evil (Unlawful Legal scam) pushed by the LEGAL FRAUD BAR …

  2. Western Europeans are out to lunch along with their rogue governments. The immigrants are needed to bring sanity back to these brain washed Boobs?

  3. and thats what you get when you are on fakebook

  4. This is a fine example of the idiotic monstrosity of labeling a physical act as ‘free speech’. It has allowed corrupt governments and judges to punish people for what they say, AND WHAT THEY THINK as if they have done some physical harm. How have people become so mindlessly controlled to believe that actions and words are the same thing? What you say and what you do are two completely different things.
    ‘Sticks and stones will break my bones, but words will never harm me’.

Leave a comment