Legislators in Texas have been working toward passing a host of laws to reform the state’s Child Protective Services agency. New legislation has been crafted to improve the agency which has seen multiple dilemmas resulting in detrimental safety problems for children in the state. There have been several bills introduced this year aimed at improving the agency. One bill, in particular, House Bill 39, seeks in part to require medical exams to be performed more quickly on children who have been newly placed into the foster care system.
HB 39, introduced by Rep. Gene Wu (D-Houston), would mandate that the state’s Department of Family Protective Services schedule a medical examination for children who have been in temporary state custody for longer than three business days. Children in rural locations would be required to receive a medical exam within seven business days.
While the bill was originally centered around hastening medical exams for new foster children, questions arose regarding whether vaccines would be included as part of these medical exams. Rep. Bill Zedler (R-Arlington), the vice chairman of the Texas Freedom Caucus, introduced an amendment to HB 39 to make vaccinations exempt from the required medical treatments. The bill saw a turbulent debate upon Zedler’s amendment as the discussion turned to childhood vaccines and who should be responsible for crucial medical decisions when custody is obscured.
“You get that child back five, eight, 10 days later, and they’ve now had that surgery or they’ve had these vaccinations,” Zedler said according to Dallas Morning News. “That’s an issue of liberty.”
Wu was vocal about his belief that the law allows the state to assume authority in such situations. “Let me make very clear: the moment a child is removed from their home – the moment the child is removed – by law, the child is now a child of the state of Texas,” said Wu. “We have the responsibility to make sure that child is safe and is given proper medical care. That is the law.”
“When we put into the law that we are limiting the ability of our agency that is tasked with taking care of a child that is in their custody and they are legally responsible for, we are setting a dangerous precedent,” Wu continued. “This is the same thing I told you when we argued over my bills and this is the same thing I will tell you again when we argue over this bill.”
Rep. Jonathan Stickland (R-Bedford) questioned Wu’s choice of wording: “Mr. Wu, you used the word ‘belongs to the state of Texas.’ Do you want to rethink that wording?” he asked. Stickland then interrupted Wu’s response and went on to ask “True or false: that CPS has taken children and found that they were wrong in doing so? And returned the child? Has that happened, Representative Wu?” Wu acknowledged that it has occurred “on rare occasions.”
Stickland challenged not only Wu but also Rep. Sarah Davis (R-West University Place), who sought to add an additional amendment in response to the amendment of Zedler’s, which would allow “cancer-preventing” vaccines to be administered, particularly the HPV vaccine.
Davis noted statistics related to cervical cancer deaths and low HPV vaccination rates in Texas and said that “the HPV vaccine will eliminate cervical cancer.” Stickland asked Davis if she believed that parents had the right to choose medical procedures for their children. Davis responded that she believed “children that have been taken from their parents and are in protective custody undergoing a medical examination should be given a vaccine that prevents them from developing cancer.”
You can’t handle the truth about vaccines (Ad)
Stickland asked Davis if she understood that they were discussing the issue of children in temporary custody with no parental rights terminated during the medical exams. “Agreed, but cancer is not temporary,” Davis answered.
Stickland repeated his question of whether she thinks parents have the right to choose medical procedures for their children, and Davis said that “we have to find a balance because there is absolutely in my opinion zero science behind the fact that any vaccines are systematically harming children.”
Rep. Jeff Leach (R-Plano) also challenged Davis’ amendment and said that it appeared that her amendment would transfer decision-making authority from families to a physician. Leach asked Davis if her amendment “goes against the wishes” of a child or the parents.
Leach added that he was not interested in deciding which vaccines are “good or bad” or who needs to be vaccinated, but was focusing on the question of who would have the authority to make vaccination decisions under her amendment. “Who at the core at the very basic level, who should make this decision?” Leach asked Davis.
Davis’s amendment was tabled in a 74-64 vote; Zedler’s amendment to prohibit vaccines during medical exams was passed in a 74-58 vote, with another amendment attached by Wu to allow for tetanus shots to be administered in emergencies.
Zedler later said to The Texas Tribune that the majority of parents that he’s communicated with are not overall opposed to vaccines but are troubled by the scheduling. He also said that “the only one that might possibly be [an emergency] is a tetanus shot.”
In the video below, Wu makes the ominous claim that parents — who’ve not been found guilty of any wrongdoing — no longer have care over their children and that those children now belong to the state. When the state begins to claim they own our children, something is very wrong.
New Hampshire-based writer Annabelle Bamforth is focused on breaking the left/right paradigm through new media and local politics. Annabelle is the editor-in-chief of Emmy-winning journalist Ben Swann’s Truth In Media Project and a producer for Mr. Swann’s Truth In Media episodes. This article first appeared here at The Free Thought Project.
Here’s a bit of info for you all regarding CPS and our “children” or or “infants”. The word, “children” is a legal term for their system of law, not ours, and there are two, UCC Roman Canon corporate/martial/admiralty law which operates solely under “color of law” (having the appearance of law but with no authority without our consent) where everything is theirs as a corporation including us when we identify as our “fictitious legal entities” (which is fraud, because we’re not fictitious, we’re real), and natural common law, where we belong to our families. “Children” belong to the state, as that word doesn’t represent our babies, it represents their trust account in our baby’s names, but sons and daughters belong to us. Confusing, I know, that’s by design.
And according to the evil corporate policies and protocol (they’re not real laws) they write, and if you notice they NEVER stop making new ones, “children” are property of the state. But here’s the trick we all need to learn, because they’ve been tricking us for centuries, corporations, by their law, may ONLY interact with other corporations, and in order for them to have authority over us, WE must give it to them by identifying ourselves as one of their corporations (we give fraudulent evidence against ourselves and our babies unknowingly, of course, that’s how they manufacture consent) and we do that when we register their births, which creates a certificate of ownership which has our baby’s name in all capital letters on it (Capitis Diminutio Maxima, the lowering of our legal statuses, and yes, there are several, to that of slaves in bondage to uphold their debt).
So they take that birth (berth/admiralty, fraud) certificate with our baby’s name in all capital letters, and they copyright it, they own it (the NAME, not the baby!), then they create a cestui qui trust account in that name, which they also own and operate and its value is then traded on the stock market (we are human capital/chattel) based on estimated lifelong earning potential (no kidding, can you say eugenics?).So they own this account, not us. There are three interested parties in these trusts, the beneficiary (the one who benefits – them), the executor (the clerk that administers it, judges), and the trustee (the one who pays for everything – us). It’s a racket. But it gets worse.
In their “color of law” they own everything, including us, as human chattel/cattle to be dealt with in whatever way they wish, but only if they can trick us into admitting their authority or jurisdiction by us identifying OURSELVES or our “children” as one of their slaves in bondage (literally, a bond).. Otherwise, they can’t touch us, and I’m not kidding. They operate under strict policies and protocol, and can’t deviate from it. We do this ourselves, admit their jurisdiction over us, unwittingly, because they don’t teach us this stuff in school – they save it for their agents – LAWYERS (none of them are good or benevolent, they ALL work for those committing this egregious fraud).
Here’s a handy fact, too: lawyers may ONLY represent infants, wards of the court/state (which we become the second we hire a lawyer), and persons of unsound mind – because we’d have to be incompetent crazies to hire a lawyer! Lawyers are NOT licensed in states, they are only registered with their trade Union, the Bar Association, which is a British organization that has nothing to do with us.
Government’s “ownership” of America’s children is not secret. There are many court cases which openly declare that our purported government owns virtually all of America’s children. “The primary control and custody of infants is with the government.” Tillman v. Roberts 108 So. 62, Van Koten v. Van Koten 154 NE 146, Senate Document 43 & 73rd Congress 1st. session, Wynehammer v. People 13 NY Rep 378, 481.
According to Nichols v. Nichols (Civ. App., 247 S.W. 2d 143), …in its capacity of “parens patriae,” government may assume direction, control, and custody of children, and delegate such authority to whom it may see fit. (See, Ridgeway v. Walter, 133 S.W.2d 748, 281 Ky. 140;Shelton v. Hensley, 299 S.W. 979, 222 Ky 808.)
So how do we counter this? We never say we even HAVE children (their legal term), we stop registering births (this may entail homeschooling, but hey, school with their Common Core bs sucks anyway) and we go back to common law where we have sons and daughters – and they have no jurisdiction over those because in common law, our families belong to us. It’s a game of semantics and language, and it’s not only a conspiracy against us, it’s a FRAUD.
Of course it’s not that simple, we must learn who we really are (we are NOT their property as our legal fictional corporations, we’re, well, us!) in order to recognize when they’re at their little legal games, and then counter it with our own, which have REAL authority. If we can all wake up to this and realize it’s all about words, the law, and jurisdiction (and our competency to stand up to them), we can get to the point they can’t even recognize us, let alone steal our sons and daughters, money, land, and put us in cages, and they have to and want to leave us the hell alone.
In a courtroom, notice a low railing around the space where plaintiffs and defendants sit. That defines the arena of Admiralty Law authority. Stay outside this area and you are in the domain of natural or common law. Your post is well done. Thank you.
My pleasure, anytime, and thanks so much~ You’re right, and it’s all occult hocus-pocus in the courtroom. First, we have the clerk masquerading as a judge because judges don’t administer statutes and codes, clerks do (we haven’t had real judges in over 100 years). They’re clerks, secretaries, peons wearing ecclesiastical religious costumes (which is treason and fraud in common law, that’s why old west sheriffs only wore a badge on their normal clothing) pretending to have authority over us when we have to give it freely to them which no one would ever do if they knew the truth but they just take it anyway because they’re bullies, liars, frauds and thieves. But I digress…
So when the clerk enters the courtroom they say “all rise” which doesn’t mean out of respect to the judge, because he’s just a clerk, it’s to breathe life into our dead or corporal/corporate entities which are nothing but artificial persons, creatures of the mind, and wholly illusory (fantasy) that THEY own LOL. It is the joinder that attaches our bodies to their fictitious entity (that has our name)! It’s absurd, but it’s true.
So we magically *poof* into these entities and are no longer flesh and blood, natural, common law men and women, we’re entirely etherial fantasies that can identify as anything we want, they don’t care (hence the gender muck-up), and these beings represent their trust account that are franchises and property of the federal government, which, as you probably know but for those that don’t, was dissolved for the last time in 1933 along with all departments, offices and officers, which is an even bigger fraud.
This nation was incorporated in 1879 I think, it was the fraudulent ratification of the 14th amendment which was supposed to free the slaves after the Civil War, but what it really did was enslave us all equally, and it wasn’t even officially ratified because several states refused to show up.
So never rise in one of their theaters of war called courtrooms, even if you’re behind the bar. These courts are in a military venue under martial law rule with penal code penalties, and they can do what they want to and with you.
And don’t forget the gold fringe around the flag, that denotes foreign conquered territory or admiralty jurisdiction (British, and by default, Roman). I never even go into places with that gold fringe, because I know once I do, I’m no longer a living, breathing woman, I’m one of their slaves, and only a ghost of my former self with no inherent rights only privileges for which I must first contract with them, then pay dearly for. We’ve been had big time.
The corporate federal government was incorporated at it’s inception in 1781, it had to be a corporation as a precursor to creating the treaty to end the war by handing the ‘contract to provide governmental services’ from the Virginia Co. to USA I.N.C. two years later in 1783. The 13th and 14th amendments work together to create the fraud of the legal fiction, then the Act of 1871 created DC as the 10 square mile independent nation state not part of this country, it clearly states that DC is the master corporation that owns all the other corporations and their assets, that’s us! We consent to being a citizen of the 10 square mile, so we are foreigners on our own land. The state and local governments incorporated in the 1950’s-60’s where they abandoned the lawful offices, and created corps with the same names and populated them, total fraud. For court docs look for Rod Class, and Thomas Degan who is a constitutional attorney who I think is still in jail because the judge labeled him a ‘terrorist’ for using the courts to try and reverse this fraud, if people understood what has been done to them, all these traitors would hang from lamp posts and people would attack their homes, so of course the judge thinks it’s domestic terrorism to expose their fraud and crimes.
What an awesome comment, Jas! Thank you! So much fraud, so little time… Wish AP would hop on the real truth and freedom bandwagon and stop wasting everyone’s time with the distraction of the “Great Divide” half (left/right paradigm) of the Roman “Divide and Conquer” strategy, and start acknowledging and exposing the “Conquer” part because time’s running out very, very quickly. God bless you.
In New York the Clerk of the Court is a different person that the man who sits on the bench, who has been elected by the public and called Judge. I would just love to see you in action if charged with a felony.
Actually, that’s smoke and mirrors, too. These courts deal only with the cestui que trust account that THE NAME represents and again, which they own. In these accounts there are three interested parties. The beneficiary (the one who benefits or gets all the money), the trustee (the one responsible for paying any charges against it) and the executor (the clerk who does the paperwork or who administrates this account masquerading as a judge). The fact that they also call the executor’s secretary a “clerk” is only semantics, probably designed to cause confusion.
And I would never be charged with a felony because I’m a God-fearing, natural law abiding woman. 😉 And if I were ever arrested unlawfully, as I wrote just a minute ago, I’d have a friend or family member file a writ of Habeas Corpus which literally means to “produce the body”. It is a court order to a person or agency holding someone in custody (such as a warden) to deliver the imprisoned individual to the court issuing the order and to show a valid reason for that person’s detention, which of course, they couldn’t do, because I’m not stupid enough to cause trouble or commit crimes. 😉
PS, By filing a Habeas Corpus, you go before the clerk/judge immediately, so the idea is not to give them any time to create or prepare a case against you. They have to prove their case immediately, and again, they must follow the rules of the court so they can’t cheat. Release therefore is in your favor unless you did something really stupid (most of the time you didn’t). If you rob a bank or assault someone, of course this won’t work, so the common law remedy is, don’t hurt anyone or their stuff!
This filing works especially well for code violations and they need time to prepare the evidence against you. Most of the time they get ALL their evidence either from you or some other trick in their arsenal like your interviews or interactions with police (they’re only code enforcers It is not the duty of the police to protect you. Their job is to protect the corporation and arrest code breakers. Sapp v. Tallahassee, 348 So. 2nd. 363, Reiff v. City of Phila. 477 F. Supp 1262, Lynch v. NC Dept. of Justice, 376 SE 2nd 247.), or their court-appointed but self-refused lawyer who will attempt to interview you supposedly to build your case, but in actually it’s building the courts case because a lawyers first duty is to the courts – and the courts first duty is to collect revenue – their second duty is to you – See: Corpus Juris Secundum Vol 7 sec. 4). And those take time, which the Habeas Corpus prevents.
PS, there are no real elections for these clerks (in fact, all government elections are rigged), these are appointed positions and the “vote” where you go to the polls is only how they manufacture fake consent. They poll you for your opinion which has already been Delphi’d (the technique to give people the illusion of choice, but the choices are ALWAYS pre-chosen). These frauds are all lawyers, and lawyers by their own definition and inside joke are known as “traitorous bastards”. They are Bar members only, chosen to sit on the bench by how successfully indoctrinated they are into the system and how proficient in defrauding us for revenue they’ve been.
There are no Judicial courts in America and have not been since 1789. Judges do not enforce Statutes and Codes. Executive Administrators enforce them, so there haven’t been any real judges in America since 1789. FRC v. GE 281 US 464, Keller v. PE 261 US 428, 1 Stat. 138-178.
All quite true, the problem is, once you’re in, they won’t let you out. The judge will declare you insane or are a domestic terrorist and throw you away and lose the key. The few good videos of guys not entering the vessel, and citing the appropriate stuff talking over the judge and winning, are guys who never had birth certs or driver’s license etc. If you have any ‘benefit’ they offer, they assume you are consenting to being a 14th amendment jurisdiction citizen and they do what they want to you, after all, in their courts the judge is the God of the courtroom, the captain of the ship. That’s why they changed it to plea to the court, from pray to the court, some things are just too obvious. It would be like putting the cops in red coats instead of the opposite color, blue.
I totally agree, you really have to start from the beginning by not registering births or filing papers to claim them back after a certain amount of days as your property which does work, and then never applying for fedID or ss number (which will make it impossible to work in their world or attend their indoctrination centers – schools). There are always common law remedies to their twisted admiralty system, and there are ways out once you’re in, but you have to learn how to do it and follow instructions to the letter.
There is a youtube channel called sovereignliving (no spaces, he has lots of clones), and he does DIY lecture style videos on how to deal with these goats, citing the law so you can pause and copy. In fact today he came out with a DIY about child support, and he has one about reclaiming your sons and daughters as your property from CPS, because in common law, our families belong to us.
My rule of thumb is, avoidance works best and silence is golden, because if they can’t prove jurisdiction they can’t proceed to the case, and they can’t prove jurisdiction unless I give them heresay evidence that I am one of their US citizen slaves. I think at this point because it’s so late in the game it’s naive to believe we can avoid them altogether, so the best thing to do is learn how to deal with them for those areas where we have to play on their field. Cheers~
Sorry to answer later, but silence is ‘NOT’ golden, they consider silence to be ‘consent’…..so you have a ‘right’ to consent to their will…lol…the whole thing is quite the irony
I know, right? It’s an ironic circus! No worries about responding late, these threads are pretty much timeless. And for the most part I agree with you that silence is consent but that’s not the case when pulled over by a cop especially, or in the courtroom before jurisdiction is established and that’s the first thing they must do or they can’t continue. Once jurisdiction is established, silence is consent. If someone’s called into court and doesn’t give hearsay evidence they’re a US citizen, or “THE NAME” called, they can’t manufacture jurisdiction, hence consent. I’ve seen this time and again.
Sure, they may try to label someone incompetent, because competency is right behind jurisdiction, but without evidence of jurisdiction they can’t and won’t touch you. They try to trick you into giving it by threatening all sorts of stuff, including your mental health or competency, and even trying to assign or appoint you a lawyer, but in the end, it’s all trickery and fraud.
Lawyers as you know, may only represent infants, wards of the court (which you become the second you hire one) and persons of unsound mind, or incompetent imbeciles. Corpus Juris Secundum Vol. 7 covers a lot of this information on whom lawyers may represent and to whom their first duty is (it’s to the court, not the client).
So really, staying silent about anything to do with the case when they’re trying to determine jurisdiction – if you question it first – works. Like when they first call “THE NAME”, and always bring your birth certificate with you if you’re EVER hauled into a courtroom because THEY own it, you never identify as it, you remain seated, holding up the birth certificate in the air and say something like, “That person is in court and it is a possession of the court and state” which is true so they can’t argue it, and it flips responsibility to the court from being the beneficiary to the trustee of their cestui que account, while not conceding jurisdiction over you. They always keep asking who you are, but you stay silent, or you can say, “I’m a friend of the court here to help in this matter” or something like that.
Without jurisdiction over you, they can’t continue the case, and they really won’t want to if you’ve flipped liability to them, because, and most people don’t know this, the clerk masquerading as a judge has to personally pay any fines for the “charge” (a bill that must be paid) supposedly against you. The clerk usually leaves the bench at this point, and then as that friend of the court, you can dismiss the case with a simple declaration, “Case dismissed” since the judge abandoned his post.
“Brown, Vol. 2, 100, lays down the rule in these terms: ‘The general rule, however, at present, is, that the admiralty acts only in rem, and that no person can be subject to that jurisdiction but by his consent, expressed by his entering into a stipulation.” Ramsey v. Allegrie, 12 Wall 611, p 409.
“In Kreble’s Reports, p. 500, quoted by Brown, it is expressly said, that without a stipulation, the admiralty has no jurisdiction at all over the person.” Ramsey v Allegrie, 12 Wall 611, p. 410.
“It is impossible to prove jurisdiction exists absent a substantial nexus with the state, such as voluntary subscription to license. All jurisdictional facts supporting claim that supposed jurisdiction exists must appear on record of the court.” Pipe Line v. Marathon. 102 SC 3858 quoting Crowell v Benson 883 US 22.
So what happens when the “Judge” decides that you are in contempt of court and orders the policeman on duty to arrest you forthwith ?
Can’t and won’t happen, unless and until they can establish jurisdiction over you. That’s why they keep asking for your NAME, which you never admit is yours because it isn’t! It represents the cestui que trust account that they own and if you don’t claim to be it, they can’t claim jurisdiction over you.While they’re criminals and frauds, they still must follow their corporate policy and protocol, they just never expect us to know their tricks.
They can’t recognize you at all in flesh and blood, and they must establish jurisdiction first. They can ask you to leave, but that’s just a request (and I’d leave, leaving the copy of the birth certificate with the clerk (always take a copy not the original) so they can’t declare the NAME didn’t show up and issue a warrant they will try to legally (but not lawfully, big difference) joinder your body to.
If you stay seated when they say “all rise” you’re not even there because the “all rise” doesn’t refer to respect for the clerk masquerading as a judge, it refers to breathing life into the dead entity your NAME that is their possession and under their control.
Jas mentioned once you’re in, you’re in, but a writ of Habeus Corpus can get anyone out of jail or custody of any kind, and even friends can do it in five easy steps if you’re already in a cage.
Of course you have to be very careful, one mistake, using one wrong word and it’s over (and they’ll do everything they can to get you to make it), but the most important thing to know about common law is, there are always common law remedies to admiralty or equity assaults.
How do you get a social security number without a US birth certificate ? And how do you obtain employment or a bank account without a valid Social Security number ? And if you want to leave the US, how do you do it without a US Passport ?
Why would you want one of those? LOL That’s the rub, they’ve made it difficult to operate outside their fake system, so school, employment, etc. is really hard (but not impossible) without one. Regarding the passport, there are American National passports you can get, but I’ll be honest, I’m not sure how to do that yet, and I can’t remember offhand what they’re called, it might be something entirely different. I urge everyone again to go to the youtube channel “sovereignliving”. He has DIY instructions for these passports and Habeas Corpus and much, much more.
Some interesting facts about the SSA, and I post these a lot but repetition is good, m’kay? lol:
1) The IRS is not a U.S. government agency. It is an agency of the IMF. Diversified Metal Products v. IRS et al. CV-93-405E-EJE U.S.D.C.D.I, Public Law 94-564, Senate report 94-1148 pg. 5967, Reorganization Plan No. 26, Public Law 102-391.
2) The IMF is an agency of the U.N. Black’s Law Dictionary 6th Ed. p. 816.
3) The United States has NOT had a Treasury since 1921. 41 Stat. Ch. 214 p. 654.
4) The U.S. Treasury is now the IMF. Presidential Documents Volume 29 – No. 4 p. 113, 22 U.S.C. 285-288.
5) The United States does not have any employees because there is no longer a United States. No more reorganizations. After over 200 years of bankruptcy it is finally over. Executive Order 12803 (privatization of our infrastructure, so it’s all up for sale to anyone or any corporation or organization from anywhere).
6) Social Security Numbers are issued by the UN through the IMF. The application for a Social Security number is the SS5 form. The Department of the Treasury (IMF) issues the SS5 not the Social Security Administration. The new SS5 forms do not state who publishes them while the old form states they are Department of the Treasury. 20 CFR Chap. 111 Subpart B 422.103 (b).
7) According to GATT you must have a Social Security Number. House Report (103-826). General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) was a multilateral agreement regulating international trade. According to its preamble, its purpose was the “substantial reduction of tariffs and other trade barriers and the elimination of preferences, on a reciprocal and mutually advantageous basis.” But that’s only if you identify as one of their slaves first (a US citizen). This is because we are traded on the stock market by our potentially estimated lifelong earnings. Remember, in common law we are American Nationals, and we are NEVER US citizens. Careful with this, they don’t tell customs or border agents, so if you do travel, make sure you print this stuff out. And all these laws are uniform now, with every country in the UN. We’re all, all UN nations, under what’s called UCCs or Uniform (universal) Commercial Code, which is just another name for admiralty, or Roman Civil law, or maritime law, or Roman Canon ecclesiastical law, it’s all the same – by different name only – and they are Legion.
8) New York City is defined in the Federal Regulations as the United Nations. Rudolph Guiliani stated on C-Span that “New York City is the capital of the World”. For once, he told the truth. 20 CFR Chap. 111, subpart B 422.103 (b) (2) (2).
9) Social Security is not insurance or a contract. Nor is there a Trust Fund.. Helvering v. Davis 301 US 619, Steward Co. V. Davis 301 US 548.
10) Your Social Security check comes directly from the IMF which is an agency of the United Nations. Look at it if you receive one. It will have written on the top left “United States Treasury.” (but it’s just a lie because the US Treasury doesn’t exist anymore, see #3)
it’s called civil asset forfeiture……and the parents can be consoled that at least they, unlike many other citizen victims of this Government, will have been accused of some travesty, however imaginary in some cases.
Not surprised at all. Kids are serial numbered with a social security number well before their 18th birthday….. made to sign a binding contract…..
Disgusting!
“…Child Protective Services agency…”
What ever they say, it’s ALWAYS the opposite.
They should be called the Child Placement Agency.
Or maybe Child Predation Services…
Birth certificate given to bankers as collateral for nation’s debt. That’s why they want illegals entering U.S. and having babies, to create more slaves. Research U.S. Representative McFadden’s speeches to Congress in the 1930s.
Spot on! It’s slightly more complicated than that, What they do is they take the birth certificate and copyright THE NAME in capital letters (so THEY own it), then from that certificate they create a cestui que trust account, and it’s that account that gets traded on the stock market, with us as their stock. That’s also why they gave women the vote, it makes them possessions of the state where in common law, wives, sons, daughters, etc. belong to the family.
Mr. Wu sounds like he wants to earn top dollars from selling organs.
This tyrant Wu sounds like he belongs in the People’s Republic of China rather than in Texas. VOTE HIM OUT! STOP CPS from destroying good families!!!!! Stop the vaccine-peddlers-of-death from harming more children with these deadly vaccines!
There is nothing more Disgusting than Lawmakers getting ready to Slobber over other people Children.
What’s with all the upper case letters, Vince? Did you find them on special today?
A man in control of his own destiny, needs prove himself to no one… “Is That Better”?
Definitely better, in one respect!
Those law makers sound like they’re pedophilia! WAKE UP AMERICA!
When a child is detained and becomes a dependent of the state… the state does not remove parental rights. Upon intake, the child is assessed and may be found to require medical, educational, or spiritual intervention, but state action must include the parent’s, tribe, or caregiver’s input, cooperation, and/or approval.
When a child is a ‘ward’ of the state, signifying the child’s incarceration in the juvenile prison system, the state does not require parental approval, cooperation, or permission. Appears Texas wants to remove parental rights in the Foster Care System, designed to be temporary not permanent as in the case of the juvenile prison system.