By Vin Armani
In this video, Vin Armani covers a recent story of an immigration raid on a US citizen where the multi-decade-long homeowner was killed by agents. The police state grows with every new law. People need to realize that all laws are backed by violence that may come visit you even if you’re innocent.
Watch the full broadcast here
Want more freedom? Join the Counter Markets newsletter and community
Vin Armani is the host of The Vin Armani Show on Activist Post, TV Star of Gigolos on Showtime, and co-founder of Agorist newsletter Counter Markets. Follow Vin on Twitter and subscribe on YouTube. Get the weekly podcast on iTunes or Stitcher. Vin is available for interviews at email Vin (at) VinArmani.com.
Good points, well articulated in this video.
Most of it sounded like hog-wash.
The number of people being killed nationally, by police and security forces is on the rise. That’s a function of policies, weapons, and tactics. Even where the actions are technically correct the tactics can be very harsh – e.g. the media pictures of the famous Elian Gonzalez capture by SWAT team. The national trend has been to focus on minimizing risk to officers. Officer fatalities are way down, and trending down. Shoot first, ask later is a policy that goes with that. The video here addresses the question: “Do we really need more policies directing armed officers into homes? Lobbying for more occurrences of that will result in more fatalities. Nowadays that is often innocent civilian fatalities.
taxpayer funded corrupt public employee labor unions against the taxpayer
labor unions have ruined America
First, regarding “Trump’s new normal” – it is not Trump’s new normal, we have had unlawful SWAT teams, etc breaking and entering American citizens homes now for a few decades. Yet, Lawfully those that serve within our governments are always REQUIRED to have PROBABLE cause, a warrant supported by Oath as to that cause, and absolutely describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
No one who serves within our governments in ANY position has any delegated authority to go against ANYTHING listed within the US Constitution as IT and all that is in Pursuance thereof it is the supreme LAW/legislation of this land, NOT the people who serve within the governments – and to make knowledge of it, and what those who serve within our governments at ALL levels are allowed to do, forbidden to do, allowed only under specific named-in-writing circumstances and with the actions allowed to be taken also in writing easier to know, it is available to all.
What you are describing is “color of law”, pretend law, fake law but enforced because those who serve within the enforcement arm of government are ignorant of what their Oath means, what they are Lawfully allowed to do or forbidden to do – nor is it taught any longer, etc.
Color of law. The appearance or semblance, without the substance, of legal right. Misuse of power, possessed by virtue of state law and made possible only because wrongdoer is clothed with authority of state, is action taken under “color of law.” Black’s Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition, page 241.
One cannot “give up” their freedom, but they can choose not to exercise it; or as what seems to be the case with people today, they may not have any knowledge of what is allowed or disallowed to those who serve within our governments because they do not bother to read the US Constitution and their own state’s Constitution. That does not excuse those that serve within our governments and are REQUIRED to take and KEEP the Oath, when to be able to KEEP the Oath they must at least read it to know what is required of them forbidden to them, allowed ONLY under specific circumstances and requiring ONLY specific responses that are all put into writing.
Nor can the people give those who serve within our governments the authority to break in doors, etc except through the process described within the US Constitution itself. There IS NO other way to change it.
No, the courts – supreme or other- cannot change the document that created them by “interpreting” it. Its meaning was known when written, and with little research its meaning is also known today (though most words in that document still mean what they did when written).
“We are bound to interpret the Constitution in the light of the law as it existed at the time it was adopted.” Mattox v. United States, 156 U. S. 237, 243.
“In this, as in other respects, it (a constitutional provision) must be interpreted in the light of the common law, the principles of history of which were familiarly known to the framers of the Constitution.” Minor v. Happersett, 12 Wall. 162….
What those Oath breakers do not realize is that they are committing at least one felony, the crime of Perjury every single time they break their Oath; PLUS *terrorism, occasionally treason, and other crimes some of which I will list below.
Remember that the US Constitution and each state’s Constitution are Laws.
Then there are statutes, etc
18 U.S. Code § 242 – Deprivation of rights under color of law: Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth,
Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or
threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.
18 USC § 241 – Conspiracy against rights: If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise
or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; or
If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in
violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.
The requirement for all Federal and State Civil officers to give their solemn and binding Oath is established in Article VI, Section 1, Clause 4. Those that serve within our governments – state and general – are bound
by their Oath to support and defend the US Constitution first, and if it applies, their own state Constitution before the orders of superiors and before the duties of their positions.
“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.” (Or similar, but all must swear to support and defend the US Constitution)
The left right paradigm is just another way to divide and conquer, dumb down the people so that they no longer understand their government, nor do they understand their own duties within it.
The illegal problem here is not smells, looks, etc, but that the actions they took to come into the USA is ILLEGAL – constitutionally. They want to come here, come here in a Lawful manner. There are ways, and then they are welcome. But they only show that they not only do NOT respect our country, our people; but thumb their noses at OUR Laws – basically we have enough unlawful and treasonous politicians, we do not need to add those who do NOT want to be Americans here in our nation, whatever country they come from. You see, they are NOT welcome when they do not want to be Americans, when they prove3 themselves willing to break OUR laws. That is the problem, not this propaganda pushed out while the traitors serving within our governments use those same ILLEGALS to assist them in destroying our nation from within.
The illegals do hurt us, They start out by breaking our laws, etc. The rest of the stuff you mentioned is BS. No one cares what they listen to, etc, we care if they are WILLING TO BECOME AMERICANS. We do not need a little China here, little Japan there, Little Africa over there, Little etc all over. We need and only want those who are willing to become Americans – and we care NOT what race, etc you are – we are already all races in this country united by the term American. United under the US Constitution and what it means. Learn that first, (by the way, you need a brush-up on the US Constitution yourself and what is allowed, what can or cannot be lost, etc) /big grin.
One of the things you said correctly is that “if you do not get to use a gun to run someone out of there house, you cannot pay another to do so” (0r something like that). Good, you got the basis of OUR real constitutional Laws that is binding on those who serve within government as much as it is binding on those of us.
As far as “delegating” rights to another, you have that incorrect. You see, one can hire security because one is allowed to defend themselves or another as part of natural law. One is able to protect ones property, all property in whatever manner is necessary.
“Constitution of this state declares, among inalienable rights of each citizen, that of acquiring, possessing and protecting property. This is one of primary objects of government, is guaranteed by constitution, and cannot be impaired by legislation.” Billings v. Hall (1857), 7 C. 1.
“Right of protecting property, declared inalienable by constitution, is not mere right to protect it by individual force, but right to protect it by law of land, and force of body politic.” Billings v. Hall (1857), 7 C. 1.
“As general rule men have natural right to do anything which their inclinations may suggest, if it be not evil in itself, and in no way impairs the rights of others.” In Re Newman (1858), 9 C. 502.
*28 C.F.R. Section 0.85 Terrorism is defined as “the unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives”.
Reality bites
Only satanists wear a crucifix upside down
“Activist Post” Another variation of Breitbart NUTZ, capitalism has an almost unlimited resource of capital since they print the fiat currency they steal your products with much like the Aristocrats of France depicted in Vatel just like the thieves like TRUMP.