The U.K. Metropolitan police are accused of collaborating with Indian police and hackers to illegally access the emails of hundreds of activists and journalists.
A secret unit of the Metropolitan police has been partnering with hackers to monitor the emails of hundreds of political activists and journalists, according to a whistleblower familiar with the unit. The individual claims that the secret unit worked with Indian police and hackers to steal the passwords for the emails of activists, reporters, and photographers. The Guardian reports:
The person, who says he or she previously worked for the intelligence unit that monitors the activities of political campaigners, detailed their concerns in a letter to the Green party peer Jenny Jones. The peer passed on the allegations to the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC), which is investigating.
Hacked passwords were passed to the Metropolitan police unit, according to the writer of the letter, which then regularly checked the emails of the campaigners and the media to gather information. The letter to Jones listed the passwords of environmental campaigners, four of whom were from Greenpeace. Several confirmed they matched the ones they had used to open their emails.
The letter details how the unit has been accessing emails of activists “for a number of years” through a relationship one officer had with police in India who then hired the hackers to gather the email passwords. The whistleblower claims that emails of two photographers working for The Guardian were also accessed. A spokesperson for The Guardian said:
Allegations that the Metropolitan police has accessed the email accounts of Guardian journalists are extremely concerning and we expect a full and thorough investigation into these claims.
There has been no explanation as to what the Indian police or the UK police were looking for. The Guardian mentions that some of the activists were involved in environmental causes with the group Greenpeace. As TechDirt notes,
Those whose accounts were accessed were far from dangerous individuals. Although the activists may be vehemently opposed to UK government policies and the actions of several major corporations, the worst of the worst of those confirmed to be surveilled did 80 hours community service stemming from an incident where unwanted solar panels were forcibly installed on a deputy prime minister’s house.
It seems obvious the police likely had access to detailed information about protests, organizing meetings, and other private information. This could also include medical information, personal addresses, and banking records. If the letter from this apparent whistleblower is accurate it is yet another example of the global surveillance state.
This Chess Champ Memory Hack May Prevent Dementia (Ad)
Derrick Broze is an investigative journalist and liberty activist. He is the Lead Investigative Reporter for ActivistPost.com and the founder of the TheConsciousResistance.com. Follow him on Twitter. Derrick is the author of three books: The Conscious Resistance: Reflections on Anarchy and Spirituality and Finding Freedom in an Age of Confusion, Vol. 1 and Finding Freedom in an Age of Confusion, Vol. 2
Derrick is available for interviews. Please contact [email protected]
This article may be freely reposted in part or in full with author attribution and source link.
Image Credit: Anthony Freda Art
There are People who do Not view Policies as either being either Left, or Center, or Right, and they think that this is an Artificial construct to try to stifle Proper Debate, and to try to stifle Consideration of some People’s opinions.
These People view Policies as either being Bad or Good, Foolish or Wise, Incorrect or Correct, rather than being Left, Center, or Right.
They are Not swayed by the use of the Deceptive term of Extremist, such as Far Left or Far Right or Extreme Left or Extreme Right.
This is because they Believe that Everyone is an Extremist, because Everyone wants their Policy to the Extreme of what is their Policy.
Some have tried to Deceive Others, and Possibly tried to Deceive Themselves that they are Moderates rather than Extremists.
However, they do Not want what they think is their Moderate Policy to a Moderation, but they want it to an Extreme.
If someone says that it is proper that there should be 15 % Taxation, and another says that 20 % Taxation is proper, and another says that 30 % is proper, then they are All Extremists on their Taxation Policy.
The so called Moderates want their Moderateness of a 20 % Taxation to an Extreme Degree.
They may Not want to be ‘Moderate’ and ‘moderate’ their Policy to make it a different percentage of Taxation of either 15 % or 30 % like someone else wants, and this is because we are All Extremists, and even if they change their Taxation Policy, then their New Taxation Policy is an Extremist Policy, Regardless of whether they think that it is moderate.
If a Person says that he is a Moderate, then does this mean that he is Moderately Good, Moderately Wise, and Moderately Correct, or is he Moderately Bad, Moderately Foolish, and Moderately Incorrect, and those who say that they are Moderates, would explain it in a different way, and the Philosophers can debate that.
The Question is on What are People Extremists on, and it is Extremely Good, Extremely Wise, and Extremely Correct, or is it one of the other categories.
Depending on All of the Peculiar Features of a Country, then an Extremely Good, Wise, and Correct Tax Rate would be different for every different Country, and so that is a matter for each Country to Decide, and Many People in each Country would hope that their Experts managed to decide a Tax Rate, and an Economic Policy that is Extremely Good, Wise, and Correct for their particular Country.
That is up to People’s Opinions of what constitutes what is Good, Wise, and Correct, but as long as we Know that We Are All Extremists.
If a Person is a Terrorist, then they should not be called an Extremist on its own, but they should be called a Terrorist or a Criminal, and we know that what one Person considers is a Terrorist is what another Person thinks is a Freedom fighter.
There are Extremists who are Good, Wise, and Correct, and we now Know that We Are All Extremists, and so there is No need to call other People extremists, while some matters are more unpleasant to comment on, because of the Shadow American Regime, yet the Principles of Free Speech and of Agreeing to disagree without becoming disagreeable is Appropriate in a Democracy.
There are People who want more Competition because of what some People think that possible Antidemocratic tenancies of some Internet Companies, because of there being less competition, or because of being Controlled by the Shadow American Regime, and this Improper use of dismissing another Person’s opinion as Extremism was Designed by the Unprincipled as their way to try to censor the Political opinions of Americans, and to bring Tyranny and Dictatorship to America, and this is Why the Founding Fathers said that there Must be Freedom of Speech in the Constitution to Ensure Freedom and Liberty for All Americans.
Well the Yanks are doin it too. ☹️