Starting on February 4th, each day WikiLeaks began sending out a series of cryptic question Tweets teasing the world about “Vault 7.”
The questions were framed in Who, What, When, Where, Why, and How format (but not in that order). Each came with an image “clue.”
Here they are in chronological order starting with the earliest.
What is #Vault7? pic.twitter.com/PrjBU0LSAF
— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) February 4, 2017
Where is #Vault7? pic.twitter.com/1HTTYQrrIN
— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) February 5, 2017
When is #Vault7? pic.twitter.com/qwef6ysU3b
— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) February 6, 2017
Who is #Vault7? pic.twitter.com/Bj0Uz48bEp
— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) February 7, 2017
Why is #Vault7? pic.twitter.com/9oyv59Usfk
— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) February 8, 2017
How did #Vault7 make its way to WikiLeaks? pic.twitter.com/9lbEPhkR6w
— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) February 9, 2017
The first image, What, is the Svalbard Global Seed Vault, also referred to as the “doomsday seed vault” in Norway.
The second image, Where, reportedly shows a cave Nazis used to store gold and other valuables in during World War II.
RFID Scan Blockers – Available for Free (Ad)
The third image, When, has been located here:
The fourth image, Who, shows whistleblowers Bradley Manning, Edward Snowden, and WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange on newspapers under the headline “infamous spies.”
The fifth image, Why, shows a welder… and gives us yet another Air Force reference.
The sixth and final image asks “How did #Vault7 make its way to WikiLeaks?” and shows us a retro image of a woman in a beret mailing something at a mailbox.
So… What, Where, When, Who, Why and How did WikiLeaks Acquire Vault 7?
This little device delivers turnkey Internet privacy and security (Ad)
People have a lot of theories on what this series of Tweets refers to.
First, the Tweet WikiLeaks sent immediately before its first Vault 7 Tweet had to do with the FBI releasing “Vault 6” of Hillary Clinton’s emails.
Full text: FBI quietly releases part 6 of its Hillary Clinton investigation #FBIFriday PDF: https://t.co/JaERLUx70M
— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) February 4, 2017
Others, however, think it might have something to do with 9/11 and Building 7, considering the references to gold vaults, welding, and drones.
@wikileaks Buildings don’t free fall collapse into their own footprints unless they are rigged. Thermite was used. Release the facts.
— ☘Phil Jacksonville☘ (@ClutchMilroy) February 8, 2017
@wikileaks Twin Towers steal torching?
— MissMary (@DivintyMary) February 8, 2017
@wikileaks dropping #vault7 like pic.twitter.com/9ebmV6ZZ9u
— Alex (@locale40th) February 8, 2017
Maybe it’s about both, considering Hillary Clinton was a New York senator at the time of the 9/11 attacks.
Either way, thousands of people are waiting on pins and needles wondering if WikiLeaks is going to deliver on its conspiracy theory scavenger hunt. With a build up like that, it better be something good.
We could use a little truth in this world right about now…
April 21 2017 – Trigger Event for the US Dollar? (Ad)
Delivered by The Daily Sheeple
We encourage you to share and republish our reports, analyses, breaking news and videos (Click for details).
Contributed by Melissa Dykes of The Daily Sheeple.
Melissa Dykes is a writer, researcher, and analyst for The Daily Sheeple and a co-creator of Truthstream Media with Aaron Dykes, a site that offers teleprompter-free, unscripted analysis of The Matrix we find ourselves living in. Melissa and Aaron also recently launched Revolution of the Method and Informed Dissent. Wake the flock up!
The powers that be absolutely cannot allow a credible alternative to the official conspiracy theory about 9/11. If Wikileaks has proof 9/11 was an inside job, I would be amazed if it ever saw the light of day.
Are you saying that the powers that be dictate what Wikileaks releases?
That would be horrifyingly disappointing, to say the least.
Wikileaks was way too convenient when it first emerged, triggering the Arab Springs. From the beginning, super smart folks such as globalism expert Prof. Michel Chossudovsky and historian Webster Tarpley identified Wikileaks as an op to “manufacture dissent”. Jon Rappoport deconstructed Snowden.
Like the entire globalist alphabet intelligence agencies of covert & overt ‘Spooks’ / Pentagon/ CIA/Interpol et al …just can’t seem to find & locate the source of the Wikileaks ‘whistle-blower’s’ hideout???
…give me a beak!
Haha, yes, shades of Bin Laden, hiding in caves on dialysis, masterminding how to make US fighter jets stand down…..post 9/11 commanding the global Al-CIA-duh network while outwitting the sharpest minds in the Pentagon and global intelligence. 😉
Get ready for a wicked psy op curve ball. We already know, besides having a Rothschild lawyer (hat tip to investigative journalist Lila Rajiva), Assange has been openly hostile and dismissive of the 9/11 Truth movement telling Belfast Telegraph in 2010 “I’m constantly annoyed that people are distracted by false conspiracies such as 9/11, when all around we provide evidence of real conspiracies…” http://911blogger.com/news/2010-07-22/wikileaks-founder-julian-assange-annoyed-911-truth
The only time Assange and his limited hangout ilk will admit to 9/11 having been an inside job is when their handlers decide its time for some Shock Doctrine to further demoralize and fragment Americans. This process is underway with Soros et al whipping up leftist useful idiots into angry frenzied mobs and while intelligence blows oxygen on the fires of a microscopic demographic of racists in an attempt to link them to liberty activists.
Not to be rude, but you sound like you’re in the midst of a ferocious fever dream.
Did you at least verify the Belfast Telegraph quote? If so, who is having the fever dream, me or Assange who believes thinks 9/11 as an inside job is the wild imagination of conspiracy theorists with no evidence?
WTC-1, 2, 6 & 7 were NUKED, see “9/11-Larry” at Veterans Today….
Search….”Urban Moving Systems” for the WHO….
Read that, sounds very plausible. Thanks.
“Nuclear Terrorism 101, Weapons So Cheap” at Veterans Today…. background info….
I hoped you’d find little-to-no sense of resentment towards you from my reply. I’m observing the way you’ve formed your sentence. The way you described your point.
I’m not trying to debate here. I’m sorry if you thought I was.
stepping up to the plate is commendable …cheers
Cheers to you, as well.
gfys
No need to be so upset, my main man.
Again, this isn’t serious business.
I didn’t seethe paragraph of complete prevaricating bullcrap you wrote above …only the bottom comment…you need a shrink…get some help
Now who’s the rude one? hehehehehehehe
OK, though it’s kinda ironic you’re describing a ferocious fever dream to someone with a professional background in neurosci.
If you read my response, you’d understand that I’m making an observation based on the way you’ve described your point, not the actual content of your point. To clarify, I’m saying you’re writing like you’re having a fever dream, not that you’re acting like a lunatic.
Also, I don’t see how that’s ironic. You can be intelligent and still have a fever dream.
Amazing how quickly the somnambulistically blind whilst chained to the wall inside Plato’s cave…. will pass specious judgement …in effect trying to kidnap the messenger & drag him or her down into their mosh pit & beat them to death with their attenuated ignorance & facetious pap.
“The test of first rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposing ides in their mind at the same time ….& still retain the ability to function”..F.Scott Fitzgerald
oh dang
“The test of first rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposing
ides in ones mind at the same time ….& still retain the ability
to function”
I try to take into account all sides of an argument as much as I possibly can. Although, what’s funny here is the fact that this has nothing to do with the conversation. What I said is entirely irrelevant to understanding or taking all applicable positions into consideration. Especially since I made no argument. I simply made an observation unrelated to the topic at hand.
Anyways, again, I wasn’t trying to be rude. Whether or not you think it happened to be rude doesn’t matter here, to be perfectly frank. Like I said, I wasn’t trying to be.
Also, no mater how eloquently (or in your case, how inconveniently and cumbersome) you want to describe “shooting the messenger”, I fail to see how that accurately describes this situation in any possible way. Qualifying your complaints with flowery, pretentious prose doesn’t make your arguments any bit more correct. Ironic how you equated my small sentence with a gang of ne’er do wells aggressively affronting the topic with “facetious pap”.
You’re being over-dramatic, and this isn’t serious business.
This is totally contrived circumlocution ego bullshit…… & you know it
I’m sure you’re just baiting me, but this discussion is very interesting.
Either way, calling me narcissistic combined with the way you’re acting sure is one funny thing to see.
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth has done great research, but also limited hangout, refusing to discuss the WHO, or the possibility of demolition beyond thermite and conventional explosives.
“The B-61, the More Usable Nuke” at Veterans Today has 65 article index on Nuclear Education.
Based on VT info > “Unequivocal 9/11 Nukes” interview with Dr James Fetzer on YouTube
Thanks, I’m familiar with Fetzer, he’s sharp, did great work on S. Hook and as a JFK assassination researcher. He’s been tenacious on the nukes. Big pic is important too, imo. It’s easy to get mired in arguing the details and then we wake up one day to find we’ve lost all of our real freedoms. I saw him in an interview last month still holding out hope Trump is an anti-NWO crusader on the white horse.
It’s their form of click bait
Once again the herd is taking the bait to look over here, no here, don’t be concerned about…
The Reptilian Overlords control all scenarios; alternative media is more obfuscation. The “news” is always late. You must have intuition to be ahead of the curve. Try meditation. Chi Gong, Tai Chi Chuan with a vegan diet; your mind is your weapon. Overthrow the Reptilian mindset.
Uhhh…
Meh…I trust Wikileaks because they’ve proven to release legit material so far. However, I have to question WHY they need to use such gimmicky “viral advertising” for this coming material? I mean, they’re the only game in town. And we know they stuff they release turns out to be legit. So…all this childish “Anonymous” style nonsense…one has to wonder why?
I, too, find this attention-getting game to be tiresome and unprofessional. If they are going to release something, just do it!
Stop the “insurance files”, stop the posturing, stop the Hollywierd style games.
This is CRAP. If wikileaks thinks it’s all just a dumb GAME then they can go f#¢€ themselves! We have actual, real serious problems with our world, some of which are worse than horror sci-fi movies and they just want to play mind games. Screw them!
They released many emails, which FBI claimed were real. Did you read any of them?
“You are only as good as your last performance.”
in ALL things…stay true to your eternal essence & you’ll always live in the NOW…cheers
“The human phenomenon is but the sum of densely coiled layers of illusion;
each of which winds itself on the supreme insanity that there are persons of any kind
when all there can be is mindless mirrors laughing and screaming as they parade
about in an endless dream…”