By Patrick Wood
By its very nature, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) is a non-profit organization exclusively run by Technocrats. As such, it is an apolitical body that is happy to serve whatever form of governance exists as long as funding is received and salaries are paid. To a Technocrat, a world run by science and technology is better than any other form of governance.
That Technocrats have played a supporting role in world history is unquestioned. Scientists, engineers and technicians played a huge role in the Communist dictatorship in the former Soviet Union (For instance, see Science and the Soviet Social Order). Technocrats likewise played a central role in support of Adolph Hitler and National Socialism (See Scientists, Engineers and National Socialism). In both cases, the Technocrat goal was not necessarily Communism or Nazism, but rather the methodical exercise of science according to its Scientific Method. In other words, the process was more important than the outcome – and in both cases, the outcome was not questioned or resisted, but simply accepted.
The reason that ICANN formerly served the interests of the United States was simply that it answered to our government’s judicial, legislative and executive branches. In other words, the U.S. held the umbrella over ICANN and that was enough to keep it working for our national interests and not for someone else’s interests.
Obama changed that when he cut ICANN loose on September 30, 2016 by letting the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) contract expire without being renewed. After expiration, we forever lost the right to renew the contract again.
So, ICANN is now a “free-agent” looking for shelter in the same way that a boll weevil looks for a cotton plant: it needs a host organization in order to practice its craft, and, I dare say, it doesn’t care one whit who that host is.
It is no secret that the United Nations is making a play to become host to ICANN. In particular, the UN’s International Telecommunications Union (ITU), run by the Peoples Republic of China, is expected to play the central role in this effort. However, whether it is the ITU or some other UN agency is immaterial because it will still be the UN in the end.
But, why the UN? Because it is the fountainhead of the plans and operations to establish Technocracy as the sole global economic system while destroying capitalism and free enterprise. Technocracy is the issue here. Others know it as Sustainable Development or Green Economy, but the correct historical term is Technocracy.
In February 2015, the head of climate change at the UN, Christiana Figures, stated,
This is the first time in the history of mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a defined period of time to change the economic development model that has been reigning for at least 150 years, since the industrial revolution. [emphasis added]
What is unclear about this? Sustainable Development, or Technocracy, is a resource-driven economic model regulated by energy rather than by supply and demand plus monetary currencies. In 1938, the original Technocrats defined Technocracy as “the science of social engineering, the scientific operation of the entire social mechanism to produce and distribute goods and services to the entire population.”
To achieve its Utopia goals, the UN must have ICANN’s steering wheel and throttle. But while everyone is stressing over Internet censorship of web sites and the suppression of free speech, the real prize is completely overlooked: The Internet of Things (IoT).
In terms of “follow the money”, IoT is expected to generate upwards of $3 trillion by 2025 and is growing at a rate of at least 30 percent per year. In other words, it is a huge market and money is flying everywhere. If the UN can figure out a way to tax this market, and they will, it will provide a windfall of income and perhaps enough to make it self-perpetuating. Currently, the UN is financed by contributions from member states.
But, what is the IoT and who cares? IoT are the connections between inanimate objects and the humans that depend upon them. The digital Smart Meter on your home communicates energy usage via WiFi to the utility company; but it also communicates with the major appliances in your home and can even control them remotely without your consent or knowledge. The smart phone that you carry communicates with cell towers and localized signal receptors to create a map of your every movement. Smart home technology lets your stereo send sound to remote wireless speakers and to light bulbs equipped with sensors. The security camera that you installed to watch your home while you were on vacation can communicate with other cameras, microphones, the police department, etc. Examples go on and on.
ICANN issues the so-called IP addresses that are assigned to all these devices on a global basis. The original addressing scheme, IPV4, was based on four blocks of up to three digits each, punctuated with a period (e.g., 192.168.2.14). This scheme allows for a discrete address for up to 16.8 million devices. A few years ago, IPV4 ran out of numbers, forcing Internet service providers, corporations and other organizations to improvise internal numbering systems, known as ‘proxy servers’, to issue safe addresses to devices within their own domain. These systems are not only fragile, but they are bloated beyond reason and generally easy to hack.
To fix this, ICANN devised a new IP numbering system called IPV6, which adds two more blocks of numbers (e.g., 192.168.2.14.231.58). This scheme provides for 3.4×1038 addresses, or 340 trillion, 282 billion, 366 million, 920 thousand, 938 — followed by 24 zeroes. There is probably a way to say this number, but I cannot imagine what it would be. It’s somewhere beyond a trillion trillion unique numbers for every human being on earth!
Thus, IPV6 provides a way to assign a unique and directly addressable number to every electronic device on earth… for centuries to come.
As IPV6 rolls out to the world, the modified mission for ICANN will be to inventory and categorize the device attached to each IP address. For instance, all the air conditioners in the world would be directly addressable from a single list. Likewise for all computers, all automobiles, all cameras, all phones, all refrigerators, all articles of clothing, etc.
Whoever has control over and access to this data will literally be able to control the entire world, down to the last minutiae – and that is the United Nations’ exact mission: inventory, monitor and control.
But, this concept was set in history long before the technology existed. The original bible of Technocracy, the Technocracy Study Course (1934), laid out the hard requirements necessary for its implementation:
- Register on a continuous 24 hour-per-day basis the total net conversion of energy.
- By means of the registration of energy converted and consumed, make possible a balanced load.
- Provide a continuous inventory of all production and consumption
- Provide a specific registration of the type, kind, etc., of all goods and services, where produced and where used
- Provide specific registration of the consumption of each individual, plus a record and description of the individual.[Scott, Howard et al, Technocracy Study Course, p. 232]
As I thoroughly documented in my book, Technocracy Rising: The Trojan Horse of Global Transformation, the United Nations is indeed the engine of modern Technocracy and as such, it is acting in a perfectly predictable manner. It seeks to establish a global Scientific Dictatorship where it controls all resources, all production and limits all consumption to its own liking. These Technocrats will dutifully apply their pseudo-scientific methodology to every problem in the world, and simply issue instructions to the Net to ‘make it so.’
Yes, free speech will decrease and censorship will increase, but that pales in comparison to the real prize of the IoT that the United Nations desperately wants and needs in order to accomplish its own twisted goals.
Congress never understood this when they passively let Obama fail to renew our contract with ICANN. However, Obama and his globalist handlers understood it perfectly well, which makes the deception and treachery of it even worse. Thanks to this scurrilous bunch, the world has just been sold into digital slavery, from which there may be no return.
Patrick Wood is Editor-in-Chief of Technocracy.News and author of Technocracy Rising: The Trojan Horse of Global Transformation. He is a frequent guest on radio programs around the world, and is the leading spokesman for resistance against the implementation of Technocracy.
Image Credit: CoolInfoImages
ICANN is a California nonprofit organization. It’s a California entity. It was co-opted by foreign interests after the death of the Californian responsible for taking up the cause of organizing the internet when bleeding heart ultra liberals decided, without any input from Internet users, to include foreigners, mostly the same group who were already running fraudulent internet scams. Promptly the group made it legal to use Proxies for internet domain ownerships, eliminating all transparency on the Internet. Then, the location of the organization was transferred to sites outside the United States. The US Commerce Department is bought and paid for, just as President Obama’s White House is bought and paid for, and none of these interests are kind to or interested in the protection of any Americans. If there still is an ICANN, then it is some kind of Tradename, because it would not be legally possible to remove a California entity to the Middle East.
Great comment! They’re still using GATT to enslave us individually, here are a few legal citations to show a little about what they’ve done to us over the years:
According to GATT you must have a Social Security Number. House Report (103-826). General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) was a multilateral agreement regulating international trade. According to its preamble, its purpose was the “substantial reduction of tariffs and other trade barriers and the elimination of preferences, on a reciprocal and mutually advantageous basis.”
The IRS is not a U.S. government agency. It is an agency of the IMF. Diversified Metal Products v. IRS et al. CV-93-405E-EJE U.S.D.C.D.I, Public Law 94-564, Senate report 94-1148 pg. 5967, Reorganization Plan No. 26, Public Law 102-391.
The IMF is an agency of the U.N. Black’s Law Dictionary 6th Ed. p. 816.
The United States has NOT had a Treasury since 1921. 41 Stat. Ch. 214 p. 654.
The U.S. Treasury is now the IMF. Presidential Documents Volume 29 – No. 4 p. 113, 22 U.S.C. 285-288.
The United States does not have any employees because there is no longer a United States. No more reorganizations. After over 200 years of bankruptcy it is finally over. Executive Order 12803.
The FCC, CIA, FBI, NASA and all of the other alphabet gangs were never part of the US government. Even though the “US Government” held stock in various agencies. US v Strang, 254 US 491, Lewis v. US, 680 F.2d, 1239.
Social Security Numbers are issued by the UN through the IMF. The application for a Social Security number is the SS5 form. The Department of the Treasury (IMF) issues the SS5 not the Social Security Administration. The new SS5 forms do not state who publishes them while the old form states they are Department of the Treasury. 20 CFR Chap. 111 Subpart B 422.103 (b).
There are no Judicial courts in America and have not been since 1789. Judges do not enforce Statutes and Codes. Executive Administrators enforce them. FRC v. GE 281 US 464, Keller v. PE 261 US 428, 1 Stat. 138-178.
There have not been any judges in America since 1789. There have just been administators. FRC v. GE 281 US 464, Keller v. PE 261 US 428 1 Stat. 138-178.
New York City is defined in the Federal Regulations as the United Nations. Rudolph Guiliani stated on C-Span that “New York City is the capital of the World”. For once, he told the truth. 20 CFR Chap. 111, subpart B 422.103 (b) (2) (2).
Social Security is not insurance or a contract. Nor is there a Trust Fund.. Helvering v. Davis 301 US 619, Steward Co. V. Davis 301 US 548.
Your Social Security check comes directly from the IMF which is an agency of the United Nations. Look at it if you receive one. It will have written on the top left “United States Treasury.”
Raising tariffs is what we need as a first effect in stopping China slavery.
They (China) are not going to stop so we have to be the ones to stand up and say NO by raising tariffs so it will be expensive to get goods from China.
Therefore they would rather pay real workers real wages that reflects more or less the quality of the product.
Cheap Chinese goods have been available since the 1970s but up till the 90s we have had choices.
Either the cheap China crap or the more expensive Made In America goods but people ultimately choose the later and the American companies didn’t want to pay the wages.
It gets into a lot more complicated issues with unions but that’s another can of worms.
Raising tariffs is just only one step that we need but now it’s kinda like closing the barn door after the horses fled.
Someone is really bad at math and confused as to what IP version 4 and 6 mean.
The “4” and “6” are not a count of digits or fields.
.
IPV4 is 32 bits normally displayed as four 8 bit numbers, with each 0 to 255 separated with periods,
which the numbers in hex are equal to 00 to FF each.
IPV4 has almost 4.3 billion possible address. That is 256 x 256 x 256 x 256
.
IPV6 is not some future dream. I use it everyday and have for years.
.
IPV6 is 128 bits normally displayed as eight 16 bit numbers separated by colons,
with each hex 0000 to FFFF, which if converted to decimal would be 0 to 65535 each.
IPV6 has over 340,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 possible addresses.
That is more than 3.4×10 to the power of 38 possible addresses..
IPV6 addresses are 65536 x 65536 x 65536 x 65536 x 65536 x 65536 x 65536 x 65536
Thanks for explaining that. The numbers become mind boggling. In fact the whole thing about the internet is mind boggling to me…
I still cannot fully comprehend why a number of totally independent nodes for assigning names and numbers could not be established.
That entirely independent internet webs will be running concurrently could only be more liberating.
Individuals and companies will have different address protocols depending on which networks they want to register.
Maybe this would not be the ideal situation but it is much more important to have a method of containing these fkg technocrat tyrants.
Maybe there already are such nodes with secret internet webs. Could that be possible?
Nothing new here. The internet has been censored since the last few years of the George Bush era. Chances are your comment is either being deleted or manipulated.
Whistle blowers have admit to using fake trolls to scam message boards to steer topics certain directions up as far as we know 10 accounts as the same person.
Therefore if you see two people BSing each other down a long thread chances are they may be a paid troll either two people or one person arguing with themselves.
They’ll say things like “Well I’m done with you since your so hopeless!!!” then a day later that guy will be back and on and on the argument goes. Where it stops……………….
Technocracy is not to replace capitalism (an euphemism for fascism) and free entreprise (whatever it means, free for who ?), technocracy IS capitalism, and capitalism is not something commendable.
The UN cant even agree on when the sun shines, what makes the Author think they have their $hite together enough to control the world?……they cant even feed the poor, let alone feed the rest of the world