Democratic Politicos Crimes: Why Are Some Prosecuted and Others Not?

By Catherine J. Frompovich

Here in Pennsylvania, where I live, the Democrats just got another kick in their political party’s teeth! The Attorney General of Pennsylvania, a Democrat, has been convicted on all nine counts in a perjury case and, as a result, apparently can be called a convicted criminal and face jail time.

So, the question, I and all thinking citizens ought to be asking, is why are some Democrats prosecutable while others, e.g., the Clintons, are not? Good question?!

The Internet blasts the following CBS headline “Pennsylvania AG Kathleen Kane found guilty in perjury case.”

According to that CBS article, “Kane, the first Democrat and first woman elected to the office, lost her law license over the charges and did not seek re-election this year.” That’s not setting a very good track record for Democratic women politicians, now is it? Do you remember ‘role model’ Nancy Pelosi’s actions as former Democratic Speaker of the House?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hV-05TLiiLU

Here’s what Kane faces, according to CBS:

Perjury, the only felony charged, can bring up to seven years in prison. The misdemeanor charges Kane faced included conspiracy, official oppression and false swearing.

Okay! What is it that I’m not getting about either the Democrats, politicians, or the legal system in the USA?

Isn’t there a very prominent Democrat female running as the Democratic Party’s presidential candidate who LIED to Congress about her emails and in other testimony, i.e., the Benghazi disaster that cost four American lives [3]?

Furthermore, why was Pennsylvania AG Kathleen Kane ‘hung out to dry’ by the Democratic Party and its politicos, when former U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has been ‘scotch guarded’ and protected by just about everyone in power in Washington, DC, especially the Democratic Party who should know better than to run an apparent lying criminal for president, when a jury of twelve peers took slightly longer than four hours to convict Kathleen Kane of perjury? What is it that I’m not getting?

What I’m not getting is the apparent fact that there are separate applications of U.S. laws when it comes to, and interacts with, those who are part and parcel of the New World Order crowd, as the Clintons obviously are—see the Clinton Foundation’s list of contributors [4]!

Why would FBI boss Comey’s tongue lashing [1] of Hillary Clinton’s deliberate email side-step actions be considered ‘enough’ to get her off from being prosecuted legally? Furthermore, how can the U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch’s ‘happenstance’ meeting on the Phoenix airport tarmac with Hillary’s husband Bill [2], not be included as a conspiracy and interfering with justice?

Kathleen Kane included other individuals in her ‘gotcha’ escapades so conspiracy charges were leveled. Why can’t all those who supported Hillary’s email server charade, Huma Abedin [5] et al, also be charged or, perhaps, given immunity as were some witnesses in the Kathleen Kane case.

Party politics are nothing more than political BS, in my opinion. That’s why I’m a registered Independent voter. What I quite can’t get my mind wrapped around is how many people think Hillary is ‘clean’ and ‘wholesome’ as a politician when her past scandals speak volumes.

Shouldn’t Hillary and Bill Clinton [6] BOTH be subject to a jury of peers rather than the sanctuary of political party maneuverings to make certain she becomes the next president of the United States, when, quite frankly, if Kathleen Kane gets seven years in prison, shouldn’t Hillary get that or more?

If Hillary has to appear before a jury of twelve peers, some of them just may remember what Mark Kayne sings about

https://www.facebook.com/markkayefans/videos/10153832405441733/

Ironically, there just may be one last chance to bring Hillary to real justice; it’s called Election Day November 8^th, 2016.

References:

[1] http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/05/politics/fbi-clinton-email-server-comey-damning-lines/
[2] http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/01/us/politics/meeting-between-bill-clinton-and-loretta-lynch-provokes-political-furor.html?_r=0
[3] http://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/two-benghazi-parents-sue-hillary-clinton-wrongful-death-defamation-n625861
[4] https://capitalresearch.org/2015/05/the-clinton-foundation-a-cauldron-of-conflicts-and-cronyism/
[5] http://ijr.com/2015/08/391920-trusted-senior-clinton-adviser-also-investigated-role-clinton-email-scandal/
[6] http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/05/13/flight-logs-show-bill-clinton-flew-on-sex-offenders-jet-much-more-than-previously-known.html

Resources:

CJF questions Speaking Fees: Is there a ‘smell test’?
https://www.yahoo.com/finance/video/why-bill-missing-hillarys-campaign-204617084.html

Catherine J Frompovich (website) is a retired natural nutritionist who earned advanced degrees in Nutrition and Holistic Health Sciences, Certification in Orthomolecular Theory and Practice plus Paralegal Studies. Her work has been published in national and airline magazines since the early 1980s. Catherine authored numerous books on health issues along with co-authoring papers and monographs with physicians, nurses, and holistic healthcare professionals. She has been a consumer healthcare researcher 35 years and counting.

Catherine’s latest book, published October 4, 2013, is Vaccination Voodoo, What YOU Don’t Know About Vaccines, available on Amazon.com.

Her 2012 book A Cancer Answer, Holistic BREAST Cancer Management, A Guide to Effective & Non-Toxic Treatments, is available on Amazon.com and as a Kindle eBook.

Two of Catherine’s more recent books on Amazon.com are Our Chemical Lives And The Hijacking Of Our DNA, A Probe Into What’s Probably Making Us Sick (2009) and Lord, How Can I Make It Through Grieving My Loss, An Inspirational Guide Through the Grieving Process (2008)