The sports world is ablaze right now with news that Barcelona’s star soccer player, Neymar, has to sit out of the UEFA Super Cup game and miss two weeks because he came down with a case the of the mumps.
He will be back though. Despite what MMR (measles-mumps-rubella) vaccine manufacturer Merck has people who were born in the last few decades believing via mainstream media fearporn, mumps is only very rarely fatal, and like other communicable diseases, it takes the heaviest toll on those with extremely compromised immune systems. Anyone healthy enough to play professional soccer is unlikely to fall into that category.
But the kicker (pun intended) is that Neymar was vaccinated.
So… just how exactly did he get the mumps in the first place?
Via the Daily Mail:
Barcelona forward Neymar has been ruled out for two weeks after being diagnosed with mumps, a contagious viral infection, despite having a vaccine against the disease.
The Champions League winners are preparing to face Sevilla in the UEFA Super Cup next Tuesday and will have make do without their star forward.
The statement read: ‘The first team medical staff at FC Barcelona has announced on Sunday that Neymar will be out for two weeks after being diagnosed with parotitis (mumps), despite the fact that he had previously been vaccinated against the disease.’
But I thought vaccines were just so safe and…what’s that word those pro-vaccine enthusiasts are always using? Effective?
So effective that the outbreak of measles among vaccinated people is hardly an isolated case.
Last year, the mumps ravaged numerous professional hockey teams in the NHL as well, pulling top athletes from the rosters…and those players were all vaccinated too.
It seems that mandatory vaccine policies for the world’s top teams has not served them all that well.
Worse than a few lousy weeks of discomfort with the mumps, places like India have been catching the mysterious blowback of non-polio paralysis among tens of thousands of children who were all vaccinated…a disease caused by the vaccines.
And, yet, California is leading the way to a world of forced vaccinations for children thanks to liars like pediatrician sell-out Senator Dr. Richard Pan…brazenly in the face of parental consent, and against the evidence for what is safe and necessary.
Melissa Dykes is a writer, researcher, and analyst for The Daily Sheeple and a co-creator of Truthstream Media with Aaron Dykes, a site that offers teleprompter-free, unscripted analysis of The Matrix we find ourselves living in. Melissa also co-founded Nutritional Anarchy with Daisy Luther of The Organic Prepper, a site focused on resistance through food self-sufficiency. Wake the flock up!
Did this article honestly read like an anti-vaxx post? Disgusting.
Yea, facts have a way of disgusting trolls. Here’s more for you to be disgusted about:
Former Merck scientists file suit against Merck under False Claims Act:
A formal complaint was filed in the Eastern Pennsylvania Federal District Court accusing Merck of a longstanding scheme to mislead and defraud Government health authorities worldwide. Two of Merck’s former employees have accused the pharmaceutical giant of marketing multivalent MMR vaccines under false pretenses. According to the complaint, these vaccines have been mislabeled, misbranded, adulterated and falsely certified as having a 95% efficacy rate.
Court documents filed by two Merck virologists meticulously detail how Merck ostensibly manipulated test results 2 for decades in order to create a false 95% efficacy rate for the mumps component of their multivalent MMR vaccines.
The former Merck virologists contend that the multivalent mumps component has a vastly reduced efficacy which is directly responsible for mumps outbreaks during the last decade which prompted international calls for MMR booster shots every 4 – 8 years.
Virologists Stephen Krahling and Joan Wlochowski describe how Merck had to recertify the mumps component in 2000, in order to comply with regulatory requirements in order for the mumps component to be included in two new multivalent MMR vaccines. The usual test, which had certified the mumps component’s efficacy in the 60’s, failed when used in 2000. They claim the results were so low Merck decided to change its own test protocol by testing the vaccine against the weakened mumps vaccine virus instead of the wild (naturally circulating) mumps virus.
When that modification didn’t result in the desired 95% efficacy figure, Merck’s executive directors of vaccine research, Drs Alan Shaw and Emilio Emini, instructed Drs David Krah and Mary Yagodich to implement a vast array of modifications to testing procedures3, then, allegedly pressured both Krahling and Wlochowski to participate.
When these modifications also failed to demonstrate the desired 95% efficacy rate, it is alleged that Drs Shaw and Emini instructed Drs Krah and Yagovich to abandon “gold standard” testing, and implement a new procedure, supposedly with the agreement of FDA, which included adding animal antibodies to human blood samples taken both pre and post vaccination4.
By combining the very low levels of human antibodies with animal antibodies, a much higher total level of virus neutralization was obtained than could occur from human antibodies alone. The human antibody levels alone would never protect in the real world against wild mumps. But after adding animal antibodies, the human blood samples which had previously failed under the old “gold standard” testing were retested using the “enhanced” protocols and passed with flying colors. New ‘enhanced’ tests showed 100% efficacy, not against wild mumps virus, but against the mumps vaccine virus.
However, combining the animal and human antibodies led to a new problem. In some of the tests more than 80% of pre-vaccine blood samples now showed up as immune. Usually, the highest number of pre-vaccine immune results any scientist could expect is 10%. Further manipulations of the animal antibody levels failed to bring the pre-vaccine blood test results down to the expected 10% levels.
According to the complaint, Merck then implemented additional ‘creative’ strategies to show a lack of seroconversion in immune samples in an attempt to reduce the pre-vax level to the expected 10% because had the FDA seen the high numbers of “immune” pre-vaccine samples they would have easily detected the fraudulent test procedures.
Krahling and Wlochowski worked with the same team conducting these tests, but were outraged at what they deemed to be gross scientific deception and fraudulent practices.
When Drs Krahling and Wlochowski attempted to stop what they saw as, “wholesale fabrication of test data to reach its preordained 95% efficacy threshold,” Merck allegedly made various attempts to prevent them, including threatening to jail Dr. Krahling should he inform the FDA.
Despite these efforts, Dr Krahling made numerous calls to FDA. These calls remained unanswered until Dr. Krahling reported to the FDA that Dr. Krah had removed and/or destroyed Dr. Krahling’s evidence.
An FDA agent then came and interviewed Dr. Krah, who apparently told the agent whatever was necessary to allay their concerns. The agent made no attempt to interview any other personnel, check any facilities, laboratory notebooks, or samples to corroborate what had been reported to them.
The lawsuit claims that to this day, Merck has consistently misrepresented the potency by simply quoting the 40 year old data from the pre-MMR monovalent mumps vaccine, thereby misrepresenting the efficacy of four multivalent vaccines: MMR, MMRII, Europe’s MMRvaxpro, and ProQuad, which is MMR plus chickenpox.
According to the two whistleblowers, not only have all the multivalent MMR vaccines been sold under false pretenses, but, as a result of this LACK OF EFFICACY, there have been numerous mumps outbreaks worldwide prompting calls for regular MMR boosters throughout life. These mumps outbreaks were predicted by Merck’s Dr Krah in 2001, yet Merck allegedly ‘willfully’ withheld this information from multiple governments while consistently claiming there was no need for a new mumps component.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
United States of America ex rel., Stephen A Krahling and Joan A Wlochowski, AMENDED
COMPLAINT FOR Plaintiffs, VIOLATIONS OF THE FEDERAL FALSE CLAIMS
ACT FILED Merck & Co.inc . Defendant
http://sanevax(dot)org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Merck-mumps-suit.pdf
COURTHOUSE NEWS SERVICE:
Class Says Merck Lied About Mumps Vaccine By REUBEN KRAMER
http://www.courthousenews(dot)com/2012/06/27/47851.htm
*****Chatom Primary Care sues Merck for Sherman Act monopolization, breach of warranty, violation of consumer protection laws.
The lawsuit record is available here:
http://www.naturalnews(dot)com/gallery/documents/Chatom-Lawsuit-Merck-Mumps.pdf
It alleges
-[Merck engaged in] …a decade-long scheme to falsify and misrepresent the true efficacy of its vaccine.
-Merck fraudulently represented and continues to falsely represent in its labeling and elsewhere that its Mumps Vaccine has an efficacy rate of 95 percent of higher.
-In reality, Merck knows and has taken affirmative steps to conceal — by using improper testing techniques and falsifying test data — that its Mumps Vaccine is, and has been since at least 1999, far less than 95 percent effective.
-Merck designed a testing methodology that evaluated its vaccine against a less virulent strain of the mumps virus. After the results failed to yield Merck’s desired efficacy, Merck abandoned the methodology and concealed the study’s findings.
…incorporating the use of animal antibodies to artificially inflate the results…
…destroying evidence of the falsified data and then lying to an FDA investigator…
…threatened a virologist in Merck’s vaccine division with jail if he reported the fraud to the FDA…
…the ultimate victims here are the millions of children who every year are being injected with a mumps vaccine that is not providing them with an adequate level of protection. And while this is a disease that, according to the Centers for Disease Control (‘CDC’), was supposed to be eradicated by now, the failure in Merck’s vaccine has allowed this disease to linger, with significant outbreaks continuing to occur.
Chatom Primary Care also alleges that the fraudulent Merck vaccine contributed to the 2006 mumps outbreak in the Midwest, and a 2009 outbreak elsewhere. It says, “there has remained a significant risk of a resurgence of mumps outbreaks…”
-Judge: Lawsuit Against Merck’s MMR Vaccine Fraud to Continue
http://healthimpactnews(dot)com/2014/judge-lawsuit-against-mercks-mmr-vaccine-fraud-to-continue/
-Memorandum issued by Judge explaining his ruling.
http://www.rescuepost(dot)com/files/59-opinion.pdf
-Qui Tam, Class Action Cases Against Merck Proceed: Gina Passarella, The Legal Intelligencer
http://www.thelegalintelligencer(dot)com/home/id=1202669116132/Qui-Tam-Class-Action-Cases-Against-Merck-Proceed?slreturn=20150414103317
Vaccine Whistleblowers File to Compel Merck to Respond to Federal Lawsuit:
http://healthimpactnews(dot)com/2015/vaccine-whistleblowers-file-to-compel-merk-to-respond-to-federal-lawsuit/
Pubmed has dozens of abstracts from studies of Mumps outbreaks from around the world for over a decade.
And besides of all this corruption by the pharmaceutical-government complex, antibodies have been shown not necessarily to be an indicator of immunity.
Jon Rappoport pointed out the absurdity of this flawed antibody titre concept underlying the vaccine paradigm in his excellent article, “Dumbed-down populations accept outrageous vaccine logic”: Supposedly vaccine-produced antibodies equals health (immunity), while antibodies naturally produced by the body equals illness!
Furthermore, Harvard Med School researchers in co-operation with other institutes have debunked the imperative of anti-body mediated immunity via vaccination (never mind that there are less risky and actually healthful ways of ensuring robust immunity).
It seems that our innate, not acquired, immune system is the first gate-keeper in protecting us against viral attack.
Source: Immunity 2012 Mar 23; 36(3): 415-426:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3359130/pdf/nihms-377739.pdf
As much as I will resist any forced medication of my family or myself, I am done trying to convince those who are too trusting, or stupid, or gullible to think outside of the boxes on their shoulders. As a matter of fact, with the world population going like it has, they and their children, frankly, won’t be missed. The world of the future needs people who can think rationally. Robots can be built….
hey if it happened, it happened. drug companies suck and they give us cheap and shotty vaccines. Nothing anti-vaxx about the truth, is there?
the truth is frightening. sorry about your groupthink.
It would be interesting to know WHEN all these hockey players were vaccinated & if the strain they got was from the vaccine; it is supposed to be public health policy to test the bug for origin. Since last year many got it all at the same time & I’m betting the TEAM was all shot up together for traveling purposes just like we can’t send horses to the Olympics without shots. This can be over come with antibodies tests & nosodes instead of injected vaccines though.
Most recent reports on both the mumps & whooping cough shots coming from immunologists is that they have lost their efficacy [if they ever had any]. Kind of like when they admitted that the flu shot had no benefit to seniors last year so their solution was to give them double doses [extra mercury oh boy!]
Wasn’t there an unvaccinated person in the vicinity who could have been blamed, for crying out loud?!
Yes, I saw Vladimir Putin there. I’m sure of it!