According to the U.S. CDC and FDA, vaccines are ‘safe’! That’s the mantra both have been propagandizing for longer than anyone can remember, but is it true?
Well, if you consider
The results of this new investigation show the presence of micro- and nanosized particulate matter composed of inorganic elements in vaccines’ samples which is not declared among the components and whose unduly presence is, for the time being, inexplicable. A considerable part of those particulate contaminants have already been verified in other matrices and reported in literature as non biodegradable and non biocompatible.
That candid report is from the research article “New Quality-Control Investigations on Vaccines: Micro-and Nanocontamination” published in Volume 4, Issue 1 – 2017 issue of the International Journal of Vaccines and Vaccination. [1] The article is 13 pages in length and should destroy once and for all the pseudo-science and pharmaceutical drivel that vaccines are: 1) ‘safe’; 2) effective; and 3) should be mandated for everyone from day one of birth to their grave!
Forty-four vaccines from 2 countries (France and Italy) were analyzed. The authors, Antoinetta M Gatti and Stefano Montanari, state the study was designed and “aimed at verifying a possible physical contamination.” They explain the protocol they used and the results they found.
Thirteen of the 44 vaccines tested contained Aluminum and “organic-inorganic composites” as listed in Table 2 of their report. In some vaccines they found: Lead (Pb) Cervarix (sample 17), the HPV vaccine; Agrippal S1 (sample 22); Meningitec (samples 31 & 33); and Gardasil (sample 37), the HPV vaccine.
“Some metallic particles made of Tungsten [atomic number w74] or stainless steel were also identified.”
Here’s the Periodic Table of the Elements so readers can identify the “Elements” column in Table 2 of the report.
Ironically, the only veterinary vaccine tested, Feligen, proved free of inorganic contaminants!
Figure 3: Images of Tungsten particles identified in drops of Prevenar and Infarix. They are composed respectively of Tungsten [W], Aluminum [Al], Iron [Fe] but in different concentrations. [1]
Prevenar (infants 6 weeks to children 17 years) [2] and Infarix (DTaP) [3] are two infants’ and children’s vaccines!
Regarding the extremely small sizes of the contaminants, the study authors say,
As happens with all foreign bodies, particularly that small, they induce an inflammatory reaction that is chronic because most of those particles cannot be degraded.
[CJF emphasis added]
The above findings are of particular interest since the inflammatory process is involved in all brain encephalopathies and all stages of chronic disease formation. Since those particles cannot be degraded, every vaccine a child receives just ads to the toxic body burden building up over the course of all the vaccines a child is given from day one of life until he/she meets the required mandatory CDC/FDA schedule. Is there any wonder why today’s children have the highest demographic for chronic disease than any before them?
But here’s the really truly biochemical horror part:
It is impossible not to add that particles the size often observed in vaccines can enter cell nuclei and interact with the DNA [23]. 23 http://www.ceser.in/ceserp/index.php/iji/article/view/2777
That statement alone, in my opinion as a retired healthcare professional, ought to be damning enough to press criminal charges against the pharmaceutical industry and vaccine makers.
In Figure 7 red blood cells appear, but can’t be identified as human or animal! Unbelievable, and Big Pharma, the CDC and FDA promote such shoddy biological products as injectables mandated for infants at 2, 4, and 6 month ‘well baby’ pediatrician visits. There ought to be a law against that.
Figure 7: Image of an area in a Repevax drop where the morphology of red cells (red arrows) were identified. It is impossible to know whether they are human or animal origin. Among the debris of saline and Aluminum phosphate, there is the presence of debris (white arrows) composed of Aluminum (Al), Bromine (Br), Silicon (Si), Potassium (K), Titanium (Ti).
The authors, as part of their Conclusion, state:
The analyses carried out show that in all samples checked vaccines contain non biocompatible and bio-persistent foreign bodies which are not declared by the Producers, against which the body reacts in any case.
The above study results, plus numerous verified fraudulent vaccine research papers and vaccine science reported by the U.S. CDC, are more valid reasons for parents rightfully refusing vaccinations for their children.
Furthermore, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services must issue a moratorium on all vaccines. Furthermore, the Vaccine Court has to be made accountable to all harmed vaccinees.
The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) of 1986 (42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to 300aa-34) must be revisited by the 115th Congress immediately to correct the mistake(s) Congress made in giving vaccine makers a “get out of jail free” card leaving them off the hook for product liability offenses on all vaccines.
Natural and Non-Toxic Products. Up to 50% Off – Every Day (Ad)
References:
[1] http://medcraveonline.com/IJVV/IJVV-04-00072.pdf
[2] http://www.netdoctor.co.uk/medicines/infections/a8473/prevenar-13-pneumococcal-vaccine/
[3] http://www.rxlist.com/infanrix-drug.htm
Resources:
U.S. CDC/FDA Vaccine Excipients and Media Summary
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/downloads/appendices/b/excipient-table-2.pdf
Catherine J Frompovich (website) is a retired natural nutritionist who earned advanced degrees in Nutrition and Holistic Health Sciences, Certification in Orthomolecular Theory and Practice plus Paralegal Studies. Her work has been published in national and airline magazines since the early 1980s. Catherine authored numerous books on health issues along with co-authoring papers and monographs with physicians, nurses, and holistic healthcare professionals. She has been a consumer healthcare researcher 35 years and counting.
Catherine’s latest book, published October 4, 2013, is Vaccination Voodoo, What YOU Don’t Know About Vaccines, available on Amazon.com.
Her 2012 book A Cancer Answer, Holistic BREAST Cancer Management, A Guide to Effective & Non-Toxic Treatments, is available on Amazon.com and as a Kindle eBook.
Two of Catherine’s more recent books on Amazon.com are Our Chemical Lives And The Hijacking Of Our DNA, A Probe Into What’s Probably Making Us Sick (2009) and Lord, How Can I Make It Through Grieving My Loss, An Inspirational Guide Through the Grieving Process (2008)
Catherine’s NEW book: Eat To Beat Disease, Foods Medicinal Qualities ©2016 Catherine J Frompovich is now available
Moms and Dads everywhere you must stop this child abuse.
It simpler terms it is poison.
The results of this new investigation show the presence of micro- and nanosized particulate matter composed of inorganic elements in vaccines’ samples which is not declared among the components and whose unduly presence is, for the time being, inexplicable. A considerable part of those particulate contaminants have already been verified in other matrices and reported in literature as non biodegradable and non biocompatible.
As happens with all foreign bodies, particularly that small, they induce an inflammatory reaction that is chronic because most of those particles cannot be degraded.
particles the size often observed in vaccines can enter cell nuclei and interact with the DNA [23].
[23] http://www.ceser.in/ceserp/index.php/iji/article/view/2777
The report on this investigation was published in “New Quality-Control Investigations on Vaccines: Micro-and Nanocontamination” published in Volume 4, Issue 1 – 2017 issue of the International Journal of Vaccines and Vaccination.
http://medcraveonline.com/IJVV/IJVV-04-00072.pdf
Orac on his ‘science’ blog implied that this information is nothing but scaremongering by anti-vaccination laypeople.
In truth, the investigation was conducted by scientists and duly reported in a scientific journal and at the top of the article (report) you can see that the journal editors / authors of this report believe vaccines to have been “one of the most notable inventions meant to protect people from infectious diseases.”
Nonetheless, their analyses showed that “in ALL (my emphasis) samples checked vaccines contain non biocompatible and bio-persistent foreign bodies which are not declared by the Producers.” The authors further conclude that it is their hypothesis that this contamination was unintentional and that improved manufacturing and safety auditing practices should be able to eliminate contamination of this kind in future.
That’s not scaremongering, that’s not even adopting an accusatory tone; that’s an entirely level-headed, rational attempt at making this particular form of medicine a little safer.
As to you, it pays to actually do some fact-checking yourself, instead of resorting to groupie behaviour in blind faith to “authority”, such as Orac regards himself.
People, such as Orac, who cannot bear even the mere pointing out of any flaws in mainstream medicine and must completely tear down any mention of any such flaws, in order for them to feel great about themselves and the way of life they are wedded to, most likely have a serious case of cognitive dissonance and surely have something to hide.
This study is junk science. Two big problems with it:
1) No control samples were tested. Therefore, the particles might have come from their lab, the air, the syringes, bottles or other tools. The researchers cannot demonstrate that the particles were actually in the vaccines!
2) The samples were prepared by evaporation. This is a problem because evaporation will cause harmless dissolved substances to form crystal particles. Like salt forming crystals as salt water dries. Evaporation is not how particle analysis is normally done, which is by filtration. So the observed particles may simply be crystals formed by evaporation.
Both of these problems are fatal flaws. Each one renders the results worthless.
Orac is RIGHT, and vaccine activists should stop promoting this crappy paper.
How could there be a control for such an experiment? What would be the control?
An appropriate control for this study would be vials of ultra-pure water, known to contain zero particles. Then, these vials would be processed in exactly the same way as the vaccine samples, using identical tools, by the same person on the same day.
This is important because its the only way to prove that the particles were not introduced into the vaccine samples by the researchers. This is standard scientific method. Controls are necessary in EVERY study.
Note that the controls must be processed on the same day with the same tools. The researchers cannot go back to the lab today, in response to the criticism, and run control samples. its too late. The entire thing needs to be done over.
Science fail!
Nice try. You cannot refute the truth, but keep stomping your feet.
Bottom line, people do not want their healthy children injected with toxic poisons. The CDC and the government does though. You cannot improve healthy children’
s lives by injecting them with known poisons and heavy metals, and DNA fragments from aborted fetuses. Vaccination is truly junk science, and anyone that has done a moderate amount of independent research will quickly come to the same conclusion. Its lunacy, bordering on the criminal what we do to our children all for corporate profits, with no liability for the endless damage vaccines have been proven to do. There are zero studies showing vaccines are necessary, effective, and most of all , safe. Vaccines are the perfect example of junk science. And our children pay the price.
I agree. But All of that is irrelevant in defending this terrible paper.
If you want to see some real science about vaccines, go to vaccinepapers org.
The entire government vaccine apparatus needs to be abolished.
Here’s the deal. You can debate science and scream about control samples. Just give people a choice as to whether or not they chose to have their children and/or themselves vaccinated. If they opt out, they opt out. Same with GMO’s. You like GMO’s? Go for them. I want them labeled so that I KNOW WHAT I AM BUYING. Why the huge legislative push by Monsanto et al. to NOT label? Why take away my choice to KNOW WHAT I AM BUYING??? The implication involves regarding people as stupid and, thereby, not capable of choosing. I absolutely assure you that people, your average, everyday citizen, are not stupid.