Law Firm Files Complaint to European Court of Human Rights on Behalf of Individuals Affected by Forced Installation of “Smart” Electric Meters

By B.N. Frank

Opposition to problematic, privacy-invasive, and hazardous utility “smart” meters – electric, gas, and water – has been worldwide since they started being installed over a decade ago. One of the numerous problems associated with them is that they emit biologically harmful electromagnetic radiation that can make people and animals sick (see 1, 2, 3, 4, 5). While some utility providers allow consumers to “opt-out” of these horrible devices, others do not and this has led to legal action.

From Zero5G:

Norwegian smart meter complaint submitted to the European Court of Human Rights

July 21, 2023 | Zero5G.com |Advokatfirmaet Schjødt AS has filed a complaint with the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) in Strasbourg on behalf of eight people living in Norway. The case concerns the forced introduction of new wireless electricity meters.

The eight claim that as electricity-sensitive individuals, they suffer significant health problems from the meters and that the meters exacerbate other health problems they already have. Their complaint is the first Norwegian complaint to the ECHR concerning human rights related to electromagnetic radiation and biological damage.

THE ELECTRICITY METERS ARE APPEALED TO THE HUMAN RIGHTS COURT

The law firm Schjødt AS today submitted a complaint to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) in Strasbourg on behalf of eight persons residing in Norway. The case concerns the forced introduction of new electricity meters.

The eight claim that those who are electrosensitive, experience significant health problems from the meters, and that the meters exacerbate other health problems they already have.

Their complaint is the first Norwegian complaint to the ECHR about human rights related to electromagnetic radiation and biological harmful effects.

The eight have lost in the district court against the grid company Elvia, both lost and won in the Court of Appeal, and had their appeal to the Supreme Court rejected. The eight argue in the complaint that the Norwegian court has not made any genuine assessment of the crux of the case – which is whether the complainants’ objections to the AMS meters are “manifestly groundless”, but have unilaterally based their position on the authorities. The complainants have thus been subjected to refusal of justice, which is a human rights violation.

Link To Article HERE

Activist Post reports regularly about “smart” meters and other privacy invasive and unsafe technologies. For more information, visit our archives and the following websites: