Despite a well-documented pattern of lawlessness by the FBI, including a failure to comply with even the most modest reforms, the secret court charged with ensuring lawful FISA surveillance has essentially given the FBI unlimited mulligans for all of its unconstitutional acts.
SHOW LINKS:
- JOIN TAC
- Show Archives
- EFF – Newly Public FISC Opinion is The Best Evidence For Why Congress Must End Section 702
- James Otis – Against the Writs of Assistance (24 Feb 1761)
- John Adams – Letter to William Tudor Sr. (29 Mar 1817)
- EFF: The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court Has Made a Mockery of the Constitutional Right to Privacy
- FISC Court Order
- Wiki: FISC
- Episode – Like a Cancer: Warrantless Surveillance under Section 702
- Wired
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Subscribe: Apple | Spotify | Podbean | Google | Stitcher | TuneIn | RSS | More Platforms Here
MORE VIDEO SOURCES
- Watch on Rumble
- Watch on Twitter
- Watch on Sovren
- Watch on Odysee
- Watch on Gab TV
- Watch on Minds
- Watch on Facebook
- Watch on Bitchute
- Watch on Brighteon
- Watch on LinkedIn
FOLLOW and SUPPORT TAC:
Become a Member: http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/members/
Email Newsletter: http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/register
RSS: http://feeds.feedburner.com/tacdailydigest
Source: Tenth Amendment Center
Michael Boldin [send him email] is the founder of the Tenth Amendment Center. He was raised in Milwaukee, WI, and currently resides in Los Angeles, CA. Follow him on twitter – @michaelboldin and Facebook.
Become a Patron!
Or support us at SubscribeStar
Donate cryptocurrency HERE
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Follow us on SoMee, Telegram, HIVE, Flote, Minds, MeWe, Twitter, Gab, What Really Happened and GETTR.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.
“Although perhaps not immediately apparent, Amendments 3 and 4 are already provided for by case law in Deuteronomy 24:
‘When thou dost lend thy brother any thing, thou shalt not go into his house to fetch his pledge. Thou shalt stand abroad [remain outside, NASB], and the man to whom thou dost lend shall bring out the pledge abroad unto thee.’ (Deuteronomy 24:10-11)1
“Even a man who has a lawful claim to another man’s pledge is not permitted to trespass another man’s home. In 1763, Sir William Pitt, Earl of Chatham, England, wrote what might be considered an applied commentary of Deuteronomy 24:10-11:
‘The poorest man may in his cottage bid defiance to all the forces of the Crown. It may be frail – its roof may shake – the wind may blow through it – the storm may enter – the rain may enter – but the King of England cannot enter! – all his force dare not cross the threshold of the ruined tenement.’2
“Under constitutional law, the United States government is no longer obligated to honor its guarantee because it has appropriated all private property via property taxes and is consequently de facto owner of all property in America….”
For more, see Chapter 13 “Amendments 3 & 4: Constitutional vs. Biblica Privacy” of free online book “Bible Law vs. the United States Constitution: The Christian Perspective” at Bible versus Constitution dot org. Click on the top entry on our Online Book page and scroll down to Chapter 13.
Then Chapter 14 “Amendment 14: Constitutional vs. Biblical Judicial Protection.”