Few People Have Subscribed to 5G Where It’s Been Installed

Maybe Because Most Don’t Want to Be Fried For Faster Internet?

Doctors, scientists, engineers, and public advocates have asked President Trump for a moratorium on 5G because of biological, environmental, and safety risks (see 1, 2, 3). Multiple 5G lawsuits have been filed in the U.S. (see 1, 2, 3, 4). Worldwide opposition continues to increase probably because people and animals have been getting sick where it has already been turned on (see 1, 2, 3, 4). Many cities and countries have tried to ban it. Slick marketing campaigns – even ones featuring Trump – still may not be enough to make 5G desirable OR economically feasible.

Last summer Activist Post reported about how few in Sacramento subscribed to 5G after it had been installed AND how many wanted it removed. Nothing seems to have changed.

From ExtremeTech:

As 5G technology has ramped up over the past few years, ISPs have started talking about replacing or augmenting expensive fiber networks with cheaper gigabit wireless access delivered via small cell networks. Now that Verizon’s 5G fixed wireless service is up and running, analyst firm MoffettNathanson examined the economics and costs of Verizon’s Sacramento rollout, and whether the initiative is economically sustainable. The company’s results make for interesting reading.

[…]

According to MoffettNathanson, only six percent of homes in Sacramento had access to Verizon 5G, with fewer than three percent actually subscribed. Of greater concern than the low subscriber numbers, however, is how few customers each small cell can actually support. On average, each small cell can only reach 27 local addresses.

This represents a real problem for companies hoping to rely on fixed wireless to roll out gigabit networks to customers at dramatically lower prices compared with the cost of running fiber-to-the-premises (FTTP).

Read Full Article

Telecom companies have still offered NO SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE that 5G is even safe. Other warnings about the technology have been issued by meteorologists, NASA, NOAA, the U.S. Navy, security experts and other credible sources (see 1. 2, 3, 4, 5).

Of course exposure to 1G through 4G is harmful as well. Pollution from Electromagnetic Radiation (“Electrosmog”) has been a problem for many years now. Many experts have been insisting we should be drastically reducing Electrosmog levels, whereas the “Race to 5G” does the exact opposite. Plus much of the cost for 5G is being passed on to taxpayers.

Activist Post reports regularly about 5G and other sources of unsafe technology. For more information, visit our archives and the following websites: