Whooping Cough ‘Invades’ the Vaccinated

Source

By Catherine J. Frompovich

Herd immunity! Where have I heard that idiomatic, epidemiologic term before? Oh yes! It’s the U.S. CDC and FDA’s Raison de’ Être for vaccines. Recent demographics for pertussis, or whooping cough, coming out of Washington state prove that herd immunity is nothing short of bunko science, and that Big Pharma’s vaccines really don’t work, or medically speaking, aren’t efficacious.

According to the Seattle Times article, “As whooping cough grows, study finds vaccines wane”

An analysis of Washington state’s 2012 pertussis epidemic, the worst since 1942, found that the vaccine to prevent the disease waned sharply and quickly in teens who were fully inoculated. [1] [A very damning observation, I’d say.]

Especially since Washington state vaccination statistics reveal,

In our state, 84 percent of toddlers got all four doses compared to 83 percent at the national level. Whooping cough can be life-threatening for young babies. While reported whooping cough cases in Washington are much lower than the epidemic levels in 2012, the disease is always present at some level.

Very few kids are completely unvaccinated. [4]

Furthermore, according to Harvard-trained immunologist Tetyana Obukhanych, PhD:

The acellular pertussis (aP) vaccine (the final element of the DTaP combined vaccine), now in use in the USA, replaced the whole cell pertussis vaccine in the late 1990s, which was followed by an unprecedented resurgence of whooping cough. An experiment with deliberate pertussis infection in primates revealed that the aP vaccine is not capable of preventing colonization and transmission of B. pertussis (see appendix for the scientific study, Item #2). The FDA has issued a warning regarding this crucial finding.[1]

[1: http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm376937.htm] [8]

One has to wonder, and ask, what’s happening. I offer my opinionated opinion.

1. Vaccines are emasculating [weakening, enfeebling, undermining, enervating, reducing] the human immune system. Why? Too many vaccines are given to children, especially when the human immune system is not functioning fully or at 100 percent, i.e., as early as 24 hours old, 2-4-6 months old, thereby turning off the immune system’s ability to deal with bio-organisms introduced either by vaccines or by natural acquisition from communal infections.

2. There are several strains of pertussis, and “Some Whooping Cough Strains Now Outsmarting Vaccine.” That is something that will continue to happen and, I contend, there will be no vaccine ever that will fully protect against any infectious disease, since infectious organisms adapt and morph to deal with pharmaceutical vaccines. Antibiotic-resistant MRSA and other resistant diseases document that genetic fact for organisms. Vaccinology, metaphorically, is chasing a rabbit down a never-ending rat hole, but can’t seem to figure that out yet.

3. Since so many vaccines are being given at extremely early ages, especially trivalent vaccines that include pertussis, the vaccine pertussis bacterium is doing the same thing that other microorganisms have done with regard to all the antibiotics humans have been fed in food or taken irresponsibly, i.e., become antibiotic resistant; the pertussis strain probably has become vaccine-resistant. I contend that all infectious children’s disease vaccine organisms (antigens) now are morphing into organisms that either will resist vaccines, or also do something else: shed, or slough off, vaccine-disease organisms from freshly vaccinated vaccinees to others, thereby causing disease outbreaks from the hysteria about more and more vaccinations.

4. Vaccines do not support the human immune system, I offer. They produce what’s called antibody antigens and responses, which are “the third and final line of defence [sic] in the immune response.” [2]

The first line of defense is the innate immune system, which Nature and human biochemistry have programmed over millennia as the first response, while the second line of defense is the humoral response, which sometimes may be activated as the primary response rather than secondary line of defense due to vaccine interferences, I also contend.

Vaccines create what’s called “adaptive responses” or a “vaccine antigen response” which, according to The Biology Project Immunology:

Adaptive immunity refers to antigen-specific immune response. The adaptive immune response is more complex than the innate. The antigen first must be processed and recognized. Once an antigen has been recognized, the adaptive immune system creates an army of immune cells specifically designed to attack that antigen. [3]

That’s where the immune system gets messed up big time, in my opinion, since only certain vaccine ‘bugs’ are remembered to be attacked and any different variety of the same disease ‘bugs’ that enter can’t be attacked because the innate immune system has been hampered by the vaccine to disregard them and/or only attack the ‘vaccine variety bug’ so another ‘version’ of the disease, i.e., pertussis in this case, can and does cause the very disease the vaccine was ‘supposed’ to ‘immunize’ against.

Remember, vaccination is not immunization, since vaccination interferes with the way natural immunity is supposed to work and as designed by generations of ancestors’ DNA and RNA handed down through time immemorial.

Acquired or adaptive immunity is an ‘invented response’ artificially created due to pharmacologically-produced antigens from vaccines injected, along with vaccinology’s toxic ingredients, e.g., aluminum to hype up further antigen responses even to the point of inflammation and/or an inflammatory response, especially in the brain.

Nature still has not had enough time to learn how to adapt to and interpolate antigens, especially aluminum, in body chemistry, I offer. Aluminum, like lead, never can be utilized healthfully by the human organism since it’s a neurotoxic metal that damages neural tissues and definitely should be kept out of the brain.

Some vaccines have chemical agents designed specifically to take toxic ingredients past the blood brain barrier. The more toxins, foreign animal DNA, human diploid cells, etc. that are injected into the immature human (infant/toddler) immune system, the more damage will be done to the ever-waning innate human immune system. Serious damage can occur because of homologous recombination, I offer, especially from human diploid cells. Is that what really is wanted by ‘science’?

However, did you know that the swine flu vaccine in 1976 actually caused more deaths and illnesses than the disease it was intended to prevent? [6, 7]

5. One has to wonder, and even question, if there could be another reason for ‘science’ reprogramming the human immune system. But, what possibly could be the reason(s)? Probably the number one reason every reader thinks of is financial gains and the money to be made. Yes, that’s a given!

However, there may be a second reason, and that is for population control and medical/pharmaceutical hegemony. Listen to Bill Gates infamous equation for population control [Co2=PxSxExC] that will lead to 10 to 15 percent reduction in global population.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=6WQtRI7A064#t=99

Nonetheless, could there be another reason that seems so far off the wall but, perhaps, for which vaccines are the very effective mechanism to achieve? Transhumanism!

What’s Transhumanism?

According to the World Transhumanist Association,

The new paradigm rejects a crucial assumption that is implicit in both traditional futurology and practically all of today’s political thinking. This is the assumption that the “human condition” is at root a constant. Present-day processes can be fine-tuned; wealth can be increased and redistributed; tools can be developed and refined; culture can change, sometimes drastically; but human nature itself is not up for grabs. [5]

Is transhumanism a ‘quantum’ belief or theory that the human race can evolve beyond its current physical and mental limitations, especially by means of science and technology?

One aspect of transhumanism, which I think science is tinkering around with now that needs chemical assistance is

Uploading of our consciousness into a virtual reality. If we could scan the synaptic matrix of a human brain and simulate it on a computer then it would be possible for us to migrate from our biological embodiments to a purely digital substrate (given certain philosophical assumptions about the nature of consciousness and personal identity). By making sure we always had back-up copies, we might then enjoy effectively unlimited life-spans. By directing the activation flow in the simulated neural networks, we could engineer totally new types of experience. Uploading, in this sense, would probably require mature nanotechnology. But there are less extreme ways of fusing the human mind with computers. Work is being done today on developing neuro/chip interfaces. The technology is still in its early stages; but it might one day enable us to build neuroprostheses whereby we could “plug in” to cyberspace. Even less speculative are various schemes for immersive virtual reality – for instance using head-mounted displays – that communicate with the brain via our natural sense organs. [5]

Nothing, I contend, has more potential to make help make that quantum leap than pharmacologically pre-tuning and genetically modifying the human genome using certain ‘smart’ sciences, technology and appliances, genetically modified organisms, plus legal chemicals used ‘prophylactically’ by medicine and injected into all humans so that ‘leap’ can be made.

Personally, I think most humans would rather avoid the ‘science’ and toxic chemicals that go along with any sci-fi approach to transhumanism. What do you think?, since there seems to be no apparent logical reason for injecting newborns, 2-4-6 month olds, and adults with hazmat toxins such as ethylmercury, aluminum, formaldehyde, and polysorbate 80, MSG, human diploid cells, sodium borate, plus all the other toxic ingredients in each legally-mandated vaccine.

It is any wonder that infectious disease organisms are getting smart, and have learned how to become “vaccine-resistant”. What do they know that we humans don’t?

References:

[1] http://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/health/as-whooping-cough-grows-study-finds-vaccine-wanes/
[2] http://www.microbiologyonline.org.uk/about-microbiology/microbes-and-the-human-body/antibody-antigen-complex
[3] http://www.biology.arizona.edu/immunology/tutorials/immunology/page3.html
[4] http://www.doh.wa.gov/Newsroom/2013NewsReleases/WashingtonChildVaccinationRatesDecline
[5] http://www.transhumanism.org/resources/transhumanism.htm
[6] http://www.cdc.gov/flu/protect/vaccine/guillainbarre.htm
[7] http://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/12/1/05-1007_article
[8] https://alethonews.wordpress.com/2015/05/02/harvard-trained-immunologist-demolishes-california-legislation-that-terminates-vaccine-exemptions/

Resources:

Whooping-cough cases rise sharply in Washington state
http://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/health/state-whooping-cough-cases-continue-to-rise/

As whooping cough grows, study finds vaccine wanes
http://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/health/as-whooping-cough-grows-study-finds-vaccine-wanes/

Harvard Trained Immunologist Demolishes California Legislation That Terminates Vaccine Exemptions
https://alethonews.wordpress.com/2015/05/02/harvard-trained-immunologist-demolishes-california-legislation-that-terminates-vaccine-exemptions/

Catherine J Frompovich (website) is a retired natural nutritionist who earned advanced degrees in Nutrition and Holistic Health Sciences, Certification in Orthomolecular Theory and Practice plus Paralegal Studies. Her work has been published in national and airline magazines since the early 1980s. Catherine authored numerous books on health issues along with co-authoring papers and monographs with physicians, nurses, and holistic healthcare professionals. She has been a consumer healthcare researcher 35 years and counting.

Two of Catherine’s more recent books on Amazon.com are Our Chemical Lives And The Hijacking Of Our DNA, A Probe Into What’s Probably Making Us Sick (2009) and Lord, How Can I Make It Through Grieving My Loss, An Inspirational Guide Through the Grieving Process (2008)