France Is the Second Country to Declare Scientific War on HPV Vaccines

Catherine J. Frompovich 
Activist Post

First it was the venerable country of Japan to listen seriously and take action regarding the serious adverse health effects young women were experiencing after receiving the highly touted ‘cervical cancer prevention’ HPV vaccines. Back on February 24, 2014, this writer published an article discussing Japan’s actions; it was “International Symposium about HPV Vaccine Problems in Japan February 25 & 26, 2014.”

My follow-up blog , “HPV Vaccine Harms Have Japanese Demanding No More HPV Vaccinations,” was published on March 31, 2014. Please see SaneVax’s Press Release regarding that historic event in Japan regarding the HPV vaccines.

One of the most important actions taken by the Japanese government as a result of that symposium, according to the Los Angeles CityWatch, is that

Japanese medical institutions are now required by law to inform young girls or their parents that the government does not recommend the vaccines any longer because of their associated adverse effects. [1] [CJF emphasis added. Shouldn’t EVERY health agency and government on the face of the globe do that too?]

As a result of the scientific work presented during the Japanese symposium, medical researchers in France apparently think there is enough scientific information to take initiatives to deal with similar problems in French girls receiving HPV vaccines. As Norma Erickson, President of SaneVax says, “The French government is not only listening to vaccine victims, safety advocates and scientists – they are sponsoring open scientific debates. Open scientific debates must occur in every country in the world,” something this writer has been advocating ever since she can remember hearing of vaccine adverse events happening to infants and toddlers back in the mid to late 1980s.

According to the latest SaneVax Press Release,

Paris, France: The use of aluminum adjuvants and HPV vaccines’ benefit versus risk profile will be under intense scrutiny and open scientific debate on May 22, 2014. Stakeholders from both sides of the vaccine debate will have an opportunity to present their case to members of the French Parliament, French Senate, health authorities, medical professionals and the public due to massive efforts on the part of E3M, a non- governmental organization of patients with MMF (macrophagic myofasciitis), and OSTA, a Parliamentary Office for Evaluation of Scientific and Technological Choice. [CJF emphasis added, and apparently out of the control of the U.S. CDC/FDA—whoa!]

[….] French government officials are willing to listen to the victims of adverse events after vaccination. [….] Not only is the French government willing to listen to the survivors of vaccine injury and scientists; they are willing to facilitate open debates with the press in attendance. [Something very unlikely to happen in the USA where Big Pharma is the big kahuna that dictates vaccinology ‘science’.]

In the morning symposium sessions, the First Round Table discussion is “Aluminum: an adjuvant under monitoring” that will include presentations from international researchers. The Second Round Table discussion, “Vaccination against HPV: caution should be exercised” will include Dr. Sin Hang Lee, MD, and Lucija Tomljenovic, PhD, two of the foremost researchers in aluminum in HPV vaccines, plus testimony of the mother of a girl afflicted with MMF after vaccination with the HPV vaccine. More discussions will follow those presentations and that agenda is here.

The afternoon round of discussions titled “First Round Table: The Safety and Efficacy of Aluminum Vaccine Adjuvants” ought to prove interesting and certainly contradictory to what’s been known as ‘peer reviewed science’ in mainstream medicine that, basically, is parroting Big Pharma’s favorable information presented to get vaccines approved for licensure.

In the Second Round Table in the afternoon, there’s an interesting discussion planned titled “Are there alternative vaccine adjuvants?” That, in this writer’s opinion, is an even more dire topic, since there are numerous adjuvants vaccines are using, including squalene which probably is as harmful as aluminum.

The reason for adjuvants in vaccines is that vaccinology can attain what’s referred to as an “antigen response,” which they consider ‘immunity’! Nothing is further from the biological facts as current communicable infectious disease rates are proving, i.e., of those contracting infectious communicable diseases in the USA for which there are vaccines, over 90 percent have been fully vaccinated. Therefore, adjuvants do not provide 100% immunity!

The Round Table debates will be open to the public and the press, which certainly is a breath of fresh air, since in the USA there’s so much that goes on behind closed doors regarding vaccines.

I can’t wait to give readers an update on the French HPV-vaccine symposium.

Notes:

[1] http://www.citywatchla.com/8br-hidden/6239-new-hpv-vaccine-study-surprises-even-doctors

Catherine J Frompovich (website) is a retired natural nutritionist who earned advanced degrees in Nutrition and Holistic Health Sciences, Certification in Orthomolecular Theory and Practice plus Paralegal Studies. Her work has been published in national and airline magazines since the early 1980s. Catherine authored numerous books on health issues along with co-authoring papers and monographs with physicians, nurses, and holistic healthcare professionals. She has been a consumer healthcare researcher 35 years and counting.

Two of Catherine’s more recent books on Amazon.com are Our Chemical Lives And The Hijacking Of Our DNA, A Probe Into What’s Probably Making Us Sick (2009) and Lord, How Can I Make It Through Grieving My Loss, An Inspirational Guide Through the Grieving Process (2008).