Congress Investigates 13 GM Car Deaths but Ignores Thousands of Vaccine Deaths

Catherine J. Frompovich
Activist Post

If Congress grilled the CEO of General Motors on April 1st, 2014 because of 13 deaths resulting from a faulty ignition switch [1] in its cars over ten or more years, when will Congress investigate Big Pharma and vaccine makers about all the deaths attributed to and apparently caused by vaccines?

Furthermore, it seems Congress is pissed-off because the problem went on for so long. Move over General Motors – there’s a more serious problem that’s killing USA children BIG time and no one cares. Your faulty ignition switch is a ‘piker’ compared with what vaccines are doing.

Below is the HRSA (Health Resources and Services Administration) report of Claims Filed and Compensated or Dismissed March 5, 2014. [2]

Without a doubt, and listed in bold font, we see Death as being attributed to vaccines. What is the total number of deaths? One thousand one hundred and thirty-two (1,132) deaths are listed, not a scant 13 that prompted Congress to hold an investigative hearing.

Congress, why can’t you care about children killed by vaccines the same as you care about 13 children killed by a faulty ignition switch in cars? However, there are thousands more who experience lifelong damages, including death. One vaccine-damage-inducing-culprit is the HPV vaccine. The girls it killed are labeled “Gardasil Girls.” Check out their disturbing stories here.

Oh by the way, I should point out that HRSA’s report states that under Injury the total is 13,964! Doesn’t that number warrant an investigation too?

There’s one more thing I think Congress and readers ought to know. The GM problem was ‘hidden’ for ten or so years. Again, that’s nothing compared with what the U.S. CDC/FDA has done about hiding autism being related to or caused by mercury in vaccines. That conspiracy goes back to 1999 when the CDC’s epidemiologist Dr. Thomas Verstraeten found that ethylmercury in vaccines increased the risk of subsequent development of neurologic development impairment. See the quote taken from the FOIA request a member of Congress received in August 2013, i.e., the CDC response (File 10 25 of 334):

Conclusion: This analysis suggests that high exposure to ethyl mercury from thimerosal-containing vaccines in the first month of life increases the risk of subsequent development of neurologic development impairment, but not of neurologic degenerative or renal impairment. Further confirmatory studies are needed. [1] [CJF emphasis added] [which apparently led to the Simpsonwood Meeting that I talk about in my book Vaccination Voodoo.] [3]

Here’s the smoking gun and clincher taken from that Verstraeten study paper:

Results: We identified 286 children with degenerative and 3702 with developmental disorders, and 310 with renal disorders. The relative risk (RR) of developing a neurologic development disorder was 1.8 (95% confidence intervals [CI] ::: 1.1-2.8) when comparing the highest exposure group at 1 month of age (cumulative dose> 25 μg) to the unexposed group. 

Within this group we also found an elevated risk for the following disorders: autism (RR 7.6, 95% Cl = 1.8-31.5), non organic sleep disorders (RR 5.0, 95% Cl = 1.6-15.9}, and speech disorders (RR 2.1, 95% (1=1.1-4.0). For the neurologic degenerative and renal disorders group we found no significantly increased risk or a decreased risk. [2] [CJF emphasis added]

CDC definitely knew ethylmercury caused “elevated risk” for autism because Dr. Verstraeten reported “autism (RR 7.6, 95% Cl = 1.8-31.5). And yet, that devastating and life-altering information was withheld from the public while Verstraeten reworked that incriminating data after the CDC/FDA and vaccine makers’ secret pow-wow in June 2000 at the Simpsonwood Conference Center in Georgia.

Here’s what Dr. Verstraeten had to say at that Simpsonwood Meeting taken from the transcript:

“We have found statistically significant relationships between exposure [to mercury in vaccines] and outcomes. At two months of age, developmental delay; exposure at three months, tics; at six months, attention deficit disorder. Exposure at one, three and six months, language and speech delays—the entire category of neurodevelopmental delays.” – Tom Verstraeten, U.S. CDC Epidemiologist —Simpsonwood Meeting transcript [4]

And here are other remarks taken from that transcript.

“I have to say the number of kids getting help in special education is growing nationally and state by state at a rate not seen before. So there is some kind of increase. We can argue about what it is due to.”

“I have taken a lot of histories of kids who are in trouble in school. The history is that developmental milestones were normal or advanced and they can’t read at second grade, they can’t write at third grade, they can’t do math in the fourth grade and it has no relationship as far as I can tell to the history we get of the developmental milestones. So I think this is a very crude measure of neurodevelopment.”

“To think there isn’t some possible problem here is unreal.” – Dr. William Weil, a pediatrician representing the Committee on Environmental Health of the American Academy of Pediatrics — Simpsonwood Meeting, June 2000 [4]

“But there is now the point at which the research results have to be handled, and even if this suspect that it is already too late to do anything regardless of any professional body and committee decides that there is no association and that information gets out, the work has been done and through the freedom of information that will be taken by others and will be used in other ways beyond the control of this group. And I am very concerned about that …”

[CJF emphasis added. Furthermore, CDC did everything to prevent that information from getting out, including giving the Verstraeten data study files to a private health corporation with an explicit contract stating that if the information were released to anyone, the U.S. CDC and government’s yearly maintenance fee would stop, according to the information I have. Moreover and rather outrageous, is this: The original Verstraeten data workup was paid for with U.S. taxpayers’ dollars; taxpayers’ owned it; its public property data and we should know the firsthand, not reworked/fudged results, Congress. Plus, how come independent researchers cannot acquire the original Verstraeten data to confirm the results? Is that why it was given to an independent corporation to prevent it from ‘surfacing’ via FOIAs to the CDC/FDA? Does that make you concerned, Congress? Where’s the science?]

“My mandate as I sit here in this group is to make sure at the end of the day that 100,000,000 are immunized with DTP, Hepatitis B and if possible Hib, this year, next year and for many years to come, and that will have to be with thimerosal containing vaccines unless a miracle occurs and an alternative is found quickly and is tried and found to be safe.”

[CJF emphasis added. Thimerosal is still in vaccines in 2014!]

Dr. John Clements, World Health Organization (WHO) — Simpsonwood Meeting, June 2000 [4]

If the GM Congressional hearing came about because parents of dead children demanded something must be done, including their displaying photographs of the dead on the back wall of the congressional hearing room, why can’t parents of those who have been killed or harmed by vaccines get a hearing going in Congress? It’s now 2014, and the cover-up has been going on since 1999. That’s how many years, Congress?

Notes:

[1] http://mashable.com/2014/04/01/general-motors-recall-hearing/
[2] http://www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation/statisticsreports.html
[3] http://activistpost.com/2013/10/vaccine-dangers-bombshell-admissions.html#more
[4] Simpsonwood Meeting Source Material: Russell Blaylock, MD. The Truth Behind the Vaccine Cover-Up 2004 http://www.whale.to/a/blaylock.html

Catherine J Frompovich (website) is a retired natural nutritionist who earned advanced degrees in Nutrition and Holistic Health Sciences, Certification in Orthomolecular Theory and Practice plus Paralegal Studies. Her work has been published in national and airline magazines since the early 1980s. Catherine authored numerous books on health issues along with co-authoring papers and monographs with physicians, nurses, and holistic healthcare professionals. She has been a consumer healthcare researcher 35 years and counting.

Two of Catherine’s more recent books on Amazon.com are Our Chemical Lives And The Hijacking Of Our DNA, A Probe Into What’s Probably Making Us Sick (2009) and Lord, How Can I Make It Through Grieving My Loss, An Inspirational Guide Through the Grieving Process (2008).