Nuclear Experimentation: Year 67

click to enlarge

Ethan Indigo Smith
Activist Post

Here is an extremely brief overview of the physical destruction of nuclear experimentation:

Nevada Test Site, multiple detonations. Hiroshima Japan, detonation. Nagasaki Japan, detonation. Bikini Atoll, multiple detonations. Hanford, Washington, storage becoming impossible to contain and? Russia and China and all nuclear nations of Europe have their own containment problems. Simi Valley, California, experimental meltdown and? Madagascar atmosphere, SNAP 9A plutonium powered satellite crashes. Three Mile Island, Pennsylvania, meltdown. Chernobyl, Ukraine, meltdown and? Fukushima, Japan, multiple meltdowns and? (Sources here and here)

The question marks above are because not even supposed nuclear scientists know exactly what is occurring in these places.

Over 2,000 experimental nuclear detonations have battered the most amazing place in the solar system, Mother Earth. Aside from the major nuclear experimentation accidents and detonations which have occurred, that we are aware of, there have been countless leaks and lost materials during the last 67 years of nuclear experimentation, mainly in the fields of power generation and martial detonation experimentation. Some releases were less notable as far as the amount radioactive particles released, and some have been kept secret. Omitting information and keeping secrets is typical for the nuclear experimentation industry, it was incepted in secret; and because of its close ties to the global military industrial complex, and because of how insanely dangerous it is, it operates secretively to this day.

There are mad scientists among us. They have opened Pandora’s Box. Nuclear experimentation is mad. I am not a scientist, nor does one need to be to know enough about the history of nuclear experimentation and human behavior to understand its instability and unsustainability. Nuclear experimentation is truly Pandora’s Box; we have literally ignited fires that cannot be put out, opened what cannot be closed. We, the human collective, have released fire which was once only allegory.

And in a world where everything is controlled by the institutions with the biggest sticks, nuclear experimentation being the biggest stick in the universe provides martial balance in mutual assured destruction. Not only are we, as a human collective, igniting more fires, we’re never going to put the current fires out as long as those with the biggest sticks are allowed to rule over us, as a global collective, threatening mutual assured destruction.

The governments of the world are as mad as MAD. I don’t care what scientists say about the potential efficiency of nuclear experimentation as a power source because I’m an empirical observer. As a self-proclaimed and unaccredited political scientist it’s obvious to me that nuclear experimentation scientists cannot be trusted.

It’s obvious the experiment began in secret among lies and was originally implemented to kill large numbers of people. 

It’s obvious to me that nuclear experimentation is unstable and unsustainable.

And no matter how learned one is, and no matter if one believes in the prophecy of the seventh generation, the detriment of nuclear experimentation should be obvious. If you believe in god or if you consider yourself spiritual or simply identify with Nietzsche one should do all one can to stand up against nuclear experimentation as violating Earth. It is death: the destroyer of worlds.

You cannot debate the scientific supporters of nuclear experimentation, you cannot present alternative perspectives to them like you can to more rational scientists, less influenced by politics, who appreciate alternative information. Nuclear scientists are zealots. Credentialed scientists who support nuclear experimentation in year 67 and beyond are not scientists in the true sense of the word, they are Pandorans. A true scientist would consider the reality of nuclear experimentation and come to the conclusion that it is unstable and unsustainable and must be discontinued. The nuclear experimentation conundrum is not scientific. The nuclear experimentation conundrum is political and even behavioral.

Just like medical doctors use science, but are not scientists; and just like statistics uses math, but is not math, nuclear experimentation is not scientifically endorsable unless the intention is to kill people. Nuclear experimentation is not science, it is jingoist war culture, and it is maddening logic; mutual assured destruction. The nuclear experimentation conundrum provides a window into the four types of political mentality, the four reactions to information.

As proposed in the Complete Patriot’s Guide to Oligarchical Collectivism, there are four basic reactions to information:

• There are the zealous who, like mad scientists, ignore all relevant information counter to their opinion and single-minded direction. 
• There are the idiots, who would rather not know anything about any serious subject, let alone nuclear experimentation. 
• There are the elitists who know about it and choose to benefit from it and profit off it at the expense of everyone else; and by “everyone,” I mean everyone alive and potentially everyone who might be alive in the future. 
• And, finally, the fourth reaction is that of the patriots. Patriots question the subject and then act out of concern for locals, land, and liberty and the only inhabitable rock around, Mother Earth.

Scientists are taught to be Pandoran and to practice hubris to the degree that not only are people going hungry while experiments are taking place, but the experiments could kill us all. Questioning patriots – people who love locals, land and liberty, not the GOP or the DNC – cannot trust or endorse nuclear experimentation as a legitimate science for Pandorans hide the truth and refuse to consider the history and the totality of the situation. It is almost as if they, the nuclear experimentation industry and the military industrial complex, are holding on to their perspective steadfastly trying to prove that the experiment can work, when it is obvious it cannot, when it obviously is out of control. If the nuclear experimentation industry was based on science rather than politics it would be terminated immediately.

I don’t care what nuclear scientists say anymore, or how factually they illustrate their point or with what certainty they speak. I don’t care because I’m human and deep down I believe that all quality invention and progression begins as intuition and insight, not from institutionalized zealots hyped up on Pandora juice and the invention of killing machines. I don’t trust scientists or anyone who with full knowledge supports nuclear experimentation, whether power generation or martial detonations for they either shutter their minds to the truth, they are zealots who just won’t let go, or they are elitists who are content to reap from the status quo. Anyone with any sense of humanity left in them, with any knowledge of the nuclear experimentation at all, would demand nuclear experimentation be ceased.

One has to resort to a considering nuclear experimentation exactly as depicted by the three wise monkeys in order to support it. You either make yourself blind to it all, deaf to alternative perspective, or secretively benefit from it so as to have nice quarters on a sinking ship.

Be the fourth monkey: Do/Fear No Evil and discontinue support of nuclear experimentation. Further, we should all criticize the so-called scientists who continue to support the industry and zealously pick and choose what they consider of the last 67 years of history.

Look not at what is contrary to propriety; listen not to what is contrary to propriety; speak not what is contrary to propriety; make no movement which is contrary to propriety.  — Confucius

Please read the companion piece: Nuclear Experimentation Killed Free Power

Ethan Indigo Smith is the author of The Terraist Letters and The Matrix of Four.