By B.N. Frank
Over the years, numerous experts have warned about privacy and cybersecurity risks with all “smart” (see 1, 2, 3, 4), wireless, artificial intelligence (A.I) and/or Internet of Things (IoT) technologies (see 1, 2, 3). Reports about risks as well as violations from “smart home” technology (see 1, 2) including “smart” meters and thermostats have been ongoing too. Here’s another one for those keeping track.
From Study Finds:
‘Smart home’ warning: Major study exposes alarming security threats
MADRID, Spain — International researchers are issuing a dire warning of security and privacy concerns lurking within smart homes. Led by IMDEA Networks and Northeastern University, scientists were able to demonstrate a variety of security and privacy threats due to the local network interactions of Internet of Things (IoT) devices and mobile apps.
As smart homes continue to evolve, they encompass a wide array of consumer-focused IoT devices, including smartphones, smart TVs, virtual assistants, and CCTV cameras. These devices come equipped with cameras, microphones, and various sensors that can perceive activities within our most intimate spaces – our homes. However, can we truly trust these devices to handle and safeguard the sensitive data they collect?
“When we think of what happens between the walls of our homes, we think of it as a trusted, private place. In reality, we find that smart devices in our homes are piercing that veil of trust and privacy — in ways that allow nearly any company to learn what devices are in your home, to know when you are home, and learn where your home is,” says David Choffnes, associate professor of computer science and executive director of the Cybersecurity and Privacy Institute at Northeastern University, in a media release. “These behaviors are generally not disclosed to consumers, and there is a need for better protections in the home.”
Activist Post is Google-Free — We Need Your Support
Contribute Just $1 Per Month at Patreon or SubscribeStar
Alarming Findings On ‘Smart Home’ Tech
For the study, researchers delved into the intricacies of local network interactions among 93 IoT devices and mobile apps and were able to unveil numerous previously undisclosed security and privacy concerns with real-world implications.
Contrary to the common perception that local networks are secure environments, the study highlights new threats linked to the inadvertent exposure of sensitive data by IoT devices within local networks using standard protocols like UPnP or mDNS. These threats include the revelation of unique device names, UUIDs (Universally Unique Identifiers), and even the geographic location of households. These can be exploited by companies involved in surveillance capitalism without the users’ knowledge.
“Analyzing the data collected by IoT Inspector, we found evidence of IoT devices inadvertently exposing at least one PII (Personally Identifiable Information), like unique hardware address (MAC), UUID, or unique device names, in thousands of real world smart homes,” explains study co-author Vijay Prakash, PhD student from the New York University Tandon School of Engineering. “Any single PII is useful for identifying a household, but combining all three of them together makes a house very unique and easily identifiable. For comparison, if a person is fingerprinted using the simplest browser fingerprinting technique, they are as unique as one in 1,500 people. If a smart home with all three types of identifiers is fingerprinted, it is as unique as one in 1.12 million smart homes.”
The Potent Weapon of Local Network Protocols
The study underscores how local network protocols can serve as side channels to access data that is theoretically protected by mobile app permissions, such as household locations.
“A side channel is a sneaky way of indirectly accessing sensitive data. For example, Android app developers are supposed to request and obtain users’ consent to access data like geolocation,” explains Narseo Vallina-Rodriguez, associate research professor of IMDEA Networks and co-founder of AppCensus. “However, we have shown that certain spyware apps and advertising companies do abuse local network protocols to silently access such sensitive information without any user awareness. All they have to do is kindly asking for it to other IoT devices deployed in the local network using standard protocols like UPnP.”
“Our study shows that the local network protocols used by IoT devices are not sufficiently protected and expose sensitive information about the home and the use we make of the devices,” adds Juan Tapiador, professor at the Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. “This information is being collected in an opaque way and makes it easier to create profiles of our habits or socioeconomic level.”
Wider Implications and Calls for Action
The implications of this research go beyond academia, emphasizing the need for manufacturers, software developers, IoT and mobile platform operators, and policymakers to take decisive action to enhance the privacy and security of smart home devices and households. Researchers have already responsibly disclosed these issues to vulnerable IoT device vendors and Google’s Android Security Team, prompting security improvements in some of these products.
The study, titled “In the Room Where It Happens: Characterizing Local Communication and Threats in Smart Homes,” was presented at the ACM Internet Measurement Conference (ACM IMC’23) in Montreal, Canada.
You might also be interested in:
- Best Home Security Systems For 2023: Top 5 Devices Most Recommended By Experts
- Best Home Security Cameras In 2023: Top 5 Devices Most Recommended By Experts
- Best Dog Breeds For Home Security: Top 5 Protective Pups According To Canine Experts
View StudyFinds’s article archive
Another disadvantage to “smart” home devices: they emit harmful electromagnetic and wireless radiation. Additionally, manufacturers are required to warn users about exposure risks. Got pets? Exposure is harmful to them too!
In fact, in 2021, a federal court ruling in favor of petitioners who sued the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) for NOT updating wireless radiation guidelines (including 5G) since 1996; however, the agency refuses to address this (see 1, 2).
Activist Post reports regularly about privacy invasive and unsafe technologies. For more information, visit our archives.
Top image: Pixabay
Become a Patron!
Or support us at SubscribeStar
Donate cryptocurrency HERE
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Follow us on SoMee, Telegram, HIVE, Minds, MeWe, Twitter – X, Gab, and What Really Happened.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.
Be the first to comment on "More Researchers Issue “a dire warning of security and privacy concerns lurking within smart homes”"